Yes, really. He has a double RR on his record, which bodes 'iffy' if not actually 'ill' to me. Why bother with these half-cocked animals? Pay around the mark where you know there is at least honesty and soundness. The subject foal may have all sorts of similar pedigrees to all sorts of animals, KK, but for those sires which throw a really crap foal every now and then, it'll be your roll of the dice to chance getting it.
Do you breed horses, btw? If you do, then why would you send your mare to one of the 75% of the bunch that Miesque feels are in the crap drawer? It's not just about conformational failings, lousy action and a predisposition to go lame or bleed - there's the mental factor, too, which should be figured in as much as any other.
There is always easy talk of culling poor mares, but you never hear the slightest whisper about culling stallions which are no longer, or have never, produced anything near to their own racing ability. And, to be frank, I would not place a double refusal to race under 'glittering career'.
Yes, anyone can breed something on the cheap, but it'll be a false economy to keep when no-one buys it: from a not-very-good mare with a possible problem, by a stallion with racing issues? How much are you going to pay for that at the sales? You aren't, are you - be honest.
I wouldn't encourage anyone to pursue breeding without a sound mare who has either raced and won a few times, preferably gaining a bit of black type, or who although may be unraced, has a desirable sireline which is in fashion. The business is now so super-competitive as people really won't part with their money as carelessly as they did before, and the market in the UK for youngsters has been quite a lot replaced by buying readymades for syndication. The top echelons of buyers and consignors won't give this foal one glance, let alone two. The middle ones won't be interested, either, as there is SO much available from sires in the mid-range of £4-10K out of solid mares. So you're looking at the very bottom of the marketplace, the equivalent of Class 6 runners.
You just look at an average race card these days and see plenty of most excellent names siring the competitors. At random, here's a Class 5 Maiden at Lingfield: BAHAMIAN BOUNTY (from whom our contributor Songsheet bred FAREER, Britannia Cup winner), PICCOLO (stalwart sire of AW runners), SINGSPIEL, COMPTON PLACE, KYLLACHY. CAPE CROSS had a runner in a Class 6 Seller, as did ISHIGURU and TAGULA. TOBOUGG, IN THE WINGS, CAPTAIN RIO, ROCK OF GIBRALTAR, DOYEN and MOTIVATOR both with Class 6 handicappers. You can pick out any number of 'fairly similar pedigrees' to group winners from that lot! But if at their prices they're still throwing vast quantities into the lowest of the ranks, the chances of you breeding the one from the dozens they produce that enters the top echelons is a pure lottery. And if you've selected an inferior stallion, and put a dodgy mare to him...
So there's no such thing as pedigree guaranteeing anything. Some sires are transmitting their abilities more often than not, like GALILEO, but the price range indicates that. You look at those guys above, and you'd think your foal's nailed on as The Next Big Thing. But you have to help some of them along with truly decent mares, too. And for others, they're just a busted flush at being daddies, like DOUBLE TRIGGER and PHOENIX REACH.
You breed the best to the best to obtain as near a specific result (sprinter, for example) that you want, and if you can't, you didn't oughter. By that, I don't mean 'best' in terms of stallion price, but 'best' in terms of the results they get, including soundness and durability - something especially important with NH in mind. Racing's clogged with fixtures full of underperforming horses (yes, I know many of them are loved by their owners, yadda-yadda) by underperforming sires out of mares who should have been donated to riding schools. Why keep adding to the bottom layer?