For Whom Should You Vote?

It said bloody Green party for me, after which it stated that they were firmly against foxhunting when I had stated I strongly agreed that it should be made legal again!!!
 
Originally posted by jairducochetfan@Apr 14 2005, 07:14 PM
+33 Conservative (As expected)
+15 Green (Yeah...)
+13 UKIP (Oh dear God)
-20 Labour
-20 Liberal Democrats
Click to expand...
Wonder how many right wing plus points you`d get for answering strongly agree to - "Should the fatherland invade Poland?"
 
Oh, feckit! That's another link you've put up, Brian, which has caused my pc to hang. It doesn't hang when a full link is put up - just with those you've done in the past week. Something very weird - or else Compaqs don't last more than 4 months...
 
Lib Dem 42
Green 8
Labour 2
UKIP -14
Tory -36


Wow, and there was me thinking about voting Conservative...!

Interesting how many people seem to get Lib Dem, I never really considered them - but then again, here in South Dorset it's considered a wasted vote as things are so tight between Labour and Conservative (135 majority Labour at present). I can't bear Blair, and I don't like the local Labour candidate, so I am a bit torn!
 
Purr - I see you have the Conservative candidate who fakes his election pictures to cover up that he wholly creditably was opposing the deportation of an asylum seeker .
 
Originally posted by Songsheet@Apr 15 2005, 09:14 AM
Green for me too, Dom, in spite of the fox-hunting answer!!
Click to expand...
Hmmm......methinks the site is pretty much rigged so it comes out Lib Dem or Green!!! <_< How on earth can it come out Green (and state that they are strongly anti-hunting) when you state that you are strongly in favour?????!!!!!! <_< :rolleyes:

Mind you, you have to look at more than just each party's manifesto (not least as they don't mean a bloody word of it!!! :lol: ) as you don't want to vote in a bloody idiot to be your local MP. For example, even if I was tempted to vote Lib Dem I certainly wouldn't as the local candidate for Newbury, David Rendell, is a f**king idiot. The bastard's been voted in at the last two elections & we have to get him out!!! Hence why I'm so pissed off with my father..... :angy:
 
We do indeed, Ardross - not sure if he's manipulative or just naive - but even if it's the latter, nobody wants a naive MP!

He's not come across very well, and didn't score any points with me when I heard him over the loudspeaker at South Dorset point to point bleating that those who were anti-hunting were "bigots". Something of a strong word to use as a blanket description of lots of people.

I really don't know what to do - I've had a couple of fall-outs with the Labour candidate so don't wish to vote for him, but Ed Matts is hardly an inspiring alternative!
 
David Rendell will win, Shadow Leader

And the site isn't rigged - it makes the point quite well that a general election is never a one issue matter
 
The problem is that the site does not allow weighting i.e all the questions are treated equally in assessing your vote .
 
And the site isn't rigged - it makes the point quite well that a general election is never a one issue matter
Click to expand...

... but for each individual voter it quite often is.

Ah.. Ardross's point.
 
Apart from the die-hards, most people will eventually vote for the party that makes promises which they percieve are least likely to adversely affect their personal financial circumstances.
 
Back
Top