Originally posted by Galileo@May 30 2008, 05:15 PM
Looking at the trials again I am sweeter and sweeter on Thewayyouare. I liked him alot as a two year old and I think this trip is perfect for him. Does the draw have a big effect in Chantilly over 12 furlongs?
I've tried mucking around with this a bit now, and probably need correct (a clarify) an earlier opinion.
Conventional wisdom is that the track favours low numbers on the round course with the turns coming where they do. However, recent history seems to suggest the race itself favours higher to middle numbers. Now it's only in the last 3 years that the trip has been reduced, but there's some evidence that in bigger fields the scrap for the rail has resulted in traffic problems for those drawn low, and if anythign those drawn higher hold sway. In truth though, there's very little in it, and things probably fall within the laws of random distribution associated with any data set of figures.
In the last 12 renewals the winner has come from
High = 4 (33%)
Middle = 5 (42%)
Low = 3 (25%)
Win and place figures don't really shed any light on things either
High = 15 (42%)
Middle = 11 (33%)
Low = 10 (28%)
The dataset is too small to draw any conclusions from, but it appears that luck in running is a more decisive factor. Holding Court won from stall 14 of 14, and Celtic Swing from 11 of 11. The lowest draw winner in the sample period was Anabee Blue who was drawn 2 of 14.
Since becoming a 10.5F race the same spread is maintained.
Lawman 5 of 20
Darsi 7 of 14
Shamardal 13 of 17
If I were looking to draw any conclusion (and it's tenuous at best) then higher to middle numbers seem to have prevailed in bigger fields, possibly due to bunching on the inside rail.
In races featuring 15 or more runners the following occurred
High = 2
Middle = 3
Low = 1
If places are added to the wins a similar pattern emerges
High = 7
Middle = 7
low = 4
Confused? So am I shrug::