Killer Hurricane Katrina

ICEBREAKER my sentiments entirely...........animals more like it to take food and fresh water yes........ but looting(for goodies etc) raping and shooting.........lower than low...... :o a brilliant add for westerners habits.................
 
I couldn't believe the stories I heard on the radio this morning of dead bodies being dumped in the same quarters where people were sleeping in the emergency shelters. That is absolutely terrible - a man being interviewed said that some men came in carrying the body of an elderly person, asked "is there anyone sleeping here?", dumped the body there and scarpered. Disease will be their next problem if they carry on like this - there were more tales of elderly people dying & being left in their makeshift beds for a couple of days.

Jesus, & this is supposed to be the civilised world? What with that & the robberies, shootings & rapes also being reported it really makes you wonder about the lowlifes that inhabit this planet - as Icebreaker says, aren't we [the human species] supposed to be compassionate, not to mention intelligent (to varying degrees)?
 
Article by Sidney Blumenthal, former senior presidential adviser to Clinton:

Katrina comes home to roost

President Bush is to blame for the scale of the disaster as a result of his administration's policies and actions


Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, the storm has left millions of Americans to scavenge for food and shelter, and hundreds reportedly dead. With its main levee broken, the evacuated city of New Orleans has become part of the Gulf of Mexico. But the damage wrought by Hurricane Katrina may not entirely be the result of an act of nature.

A year ago the US army corps of engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. After a flood killed six people in 1995, the Congress created the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project. Operated by the corps of engineers, levees and pumping stations were strengthened and renovated. In 2001, when George Bush became president, the Federal Emergency Management Agency issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely potential disasters - after a terrorist attack on New York City. But by 2003 the federal funding essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq war. By 2004, the Bush administration cut the corps of engineers' request for holding back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80%. By the beginning of this year, the administration's additional cuts, reduced by 44% since 2001, forced the corps to impose a hiring freeze. The Senate debated adding funds for fixing levees, but it was too late.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune, which before the hurricane published a series on the federal funding problem - whose presses are underwater and can now only put out an online edition - has reported: "No one can say they didn't see it coming ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."

The Bush administration's policy of turning over wetlands to developers almost certainly has contributed to the heightened level of the storm surge. In 1990, a federal task force began restoring lost wetlands around New Orleans. Every two miles of wetland between the Crescent City and the Gulf reduces a surge by half a foot. Bush promised a "no net loss" wetland policy, which had been launched by his father's administration and bolstered by President Clinton. But he reversed the approach in 2003, unleashing the developers. The army corps of engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency announced they could no longer protect wetlands unless they were somehow related to interstate commerce. In response to this potential crisis, four leading environmental groups conducted a study that concluded in 2004 that without wetlands protection New Orleans could be devastated by an ordinary - much less a category four or five - hurricane. "There's no way to describe how mindless a policy that is when it comes to wetlands protection," said one of the report's authors. The chairman of the White House's council on environmental quality dismissed the study as "highly questionable", and boasted: "Everybody loves what we're doing."

"My administration's climate change policy will be science-based," President Bush declared. But in 2002, when the Environmental Protection Agency submitted a study on global warming to the UN, reflecting its expert research, Bush derided it as "a report put out by a bureaucracy", and excised the climate change assessment from its annual report. The next year, when the EPA issued its first comprehensive Report on the Environment, stating: "Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environment", the White House simply removed the line and all such conclusions. At the G8 meeting in Gleneagles this year, Bush stymied any common action on global warming. But scientists have continued to accumulate impressive data on the rising temperature of the oceans, producing more severe hurricanes.

In February 2004, 60 scientists warned in a statement, Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking: "Successful application of science has played a large part in the policies that have made the US the world's most powerful nation and its citizens increasingly prosperous and healthy ... Indeed, this principle has long been adhered to by presidents and administrations of both parties in forming and implementing policies. The administration of George W Bush has, however, disregarded this principle ... The distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends must cease..." Bush ignored the statement.

In the two weeks preceding the storm, the trumping of science by ideology and expertise by special interests accelerated. The Federal Drug Administration announced it was postponing sale of the morning-after pill, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of its safety and approval by the FDA's scientific advisory board.

The UN special envoy for HIV/Aids in Africa accused the Bush administration of responsibility for a condom shortage in Uganda as a result of pushing its evangelical Christian agenda of "abstinence". The chief of the board of justice statistics in the justice department was ordered by the White House to delete its study that African-Americans and minorities are subject to racial profiling in police traffic stops. He refused to concede and was forced to quit. When the army's chief contracting oversight analyst objected to a $7bn no-bid contract awarded for work in Iraq to Halliburton, she was demoted despite her superior professional ratings.

On the day the levee burst in New Orleans, Bush delivered a speech comparing the Iraq war to the second world war and himself to Franklin D Roosevelt: "And he knew that the best way to bring peace and stability to the region was by bringing freedom to Japan." Bush had boarded his very own Streetcar Named Desire.

Sidney Blumenthal
 
DIM yes the season of hurricanes is due about now until OCT the last one was deemed as being early and that's why the debate was started with regards to global warming... could it have been caused by global warming ??? :o :rolleyes:
 
A spokesperson for 60's band 'The Animals' has today made a public apology saying "they were mistaken and there isn't a house in New Orleans after all".
 
Originally posted by Diamond Geezer@Sep 9 2005, 05:23 PM
A spokesperson for 60's band 'The Animals' has today made a public apology saying "they were mistaken and there isn't a house in New Orleans after all".
Excellent, DG - you never fail us!
 
A company called Kenyon International has landed the contract to remove the bodies from New Orleans. Kenyon is owned by SCI Corp, which bills itself as "the largest provider of funeral, cremation and cemetery services in North America."

In 2001 SCI was accused of "recycling" graves, removing the bodies that were there originally and throwing them in the woods to use the space to house new customers at two Jewish cemeteries in Florida.

It turned out that the company had "previous" as two years earlier the state of Texas (using its taxpayers' money) and SCI settled out of court for $210,000 in a case involving, among other suspect practices, illegal embalming. A dismissed Texas state employee attempted to subpoena the then governor of Texas to explain why he halted an investigation into the allegations made against SCI. A Texas judge halted the case.

Kenyon International was also awarded contracts in New York after the terrorist attacks of 11th September and others in Iraq.

The chairman of SCI Corp is one Roger Waltrip. Good old Roger is not only a major contributor to George W Bush's political campaign funds, he is also a long-standing family friend of the president.

It turns out that Roger had had meetings with his old pal Dubya, who was, of course the above mentioned governor of Texas, prior to the court case being stopped and the timing was very handy for George not to have to explain himself in court as campaigning for the presidency had started.

Now, cynics might see something in the company chaired by an old pal and major financial contributor being granted all these government burial contracts but I'm sure that it's juist a load of old - er, - Halliburtons.
 
How long before Bush has a golden crown struck, and declares himself Emperor? He has his hands in so many cronies' pockets I'm going to rename him Bushkassa. The strength in depth of the venality and cronyism of this President, and the sheer crassness of his term/s of office, is breath-taking.
 
Recently had some (2 :P ) abusive e-mails, complain about a T-Shirt design I was flogging, which explained the page where some character in the latest Potter book snuffs it, so saving apart from the cost of the book, but also the time spent reading the thing :rolleyes:

99_2.JPG


But I think this american site is being a little some what uncompassionate :cry:
T-Shirt Hell
 
Despite reports that this years Mardi Gras will be a washout, the Mayor of New Orleans has declared he expects a large number of floats this year...
 
I try and steer clear of any threads involving slagging off any of the racing presenters because quite simply I couldn't do any better myself.

Nor I suspect could those that do.
 
A policy which would mean that no one would be allowed to criticise a poor actor in a play or film, a jockey orvtrainer (heavy forbid), a footballer or football manager who is under-performing, a politician's performance in office, a manager of a mutual fund that caused losses in endowment policies etc etc...
 
Back
Top