• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Labour To Prop Up The Housing Market Via Pensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kathy
  • Start date Start date
Bloody hell, you're a hard one - I don't know how many publications you read but I was only after three guesses. My next was to be the:

13697.png


And I can't figure out what all the "Game, set and match is about" when all I did was to give you the correct advice about the proposed alteration in pensions legislation?
 
Not even slightly warm Brian..... go on, have a third guess. A small clue, who said I read it in a newspaper? B)

Perhaps, I come across so shallow you just immediately jumped to the conclusion I read it in The Daily Mail. Perhaps, just perhaps, I read other publications too.
 
Nah, everyone was wrong, :P The information was taken from a publication from St James' Place - where my boyfriend has his pension. B)
 
Originally posted by Kathy@May 24 2005, 08:54 PM
Nah, everyone was wrong, :P The information was taken from a publication from St James' Place - where my boyfriend has his pension. B)
So what did I read.
 
Tetley, I am sure many publications (including newspapers) are talking about it at the moment. I had been given a copy of an Annual Report of the Trustee from St Jame's Place which is where I read it. It reads at the botton: " These changes mean that you should review your pension arrangements and capitalise on the opportunities some of the transitional rules present aheard of the April 2006 deadline. We have produced a brochure "A pensions Revolution" which provides information and is available from your St James's Place Partner."

I was just gobsmacked when Brian said there were basically mistakes in their glossy brochure - and knew Brian would have presumed I read in a paper he probably regards as a comic. He was incorrect in this assumption.
 
Originally posted by Kathy@May 25 2005, 09:01 AM
I was just gobsmacked when Brian said there were basically mistakes in their glossy brochure.
Kathy, I am pleased to hear that you don't read the Daily Mail. However, you would make a very good leader writer for the paper, basing opinion on false premise.

I did not day that "there were basically mistakes" in your brochure. How could I? I haven't read it.

What I did do was attempt to put you on the right path by correcting the misconceptions that you appear to have had after reading it.
 
I do read The Daily Mail occasionally Brian - and I don't mind who knows. Will I be able to have that delivered if I move to my house near Banstead, or will if be The Financial Times or The Beano only? :confused: I take it they do deliver newspapers in Surrey? :)
 
Oops, I may have made misconceptions Brian ...my mistake. :) I will have a word with the Financial Advisor (or get the boyfriend to) when he next comes in and ask him to clarify a few points. I may just print out your response and show him that. Not sure why I am worried, as it is not MY pension. B)
 
It is not unknown for financial advisors (even those with glossy brochures) to phrase financial summaries in such a way as to encourage new business that might, coincidentally, earn commission and/or fees.
 

Recent Blog Posts

Back
Top