Because Harry actually broke an existing rule - whereas no rule was broken in Henderson's case.
Henderson effectively laid all his horses in a multiple bet and stood to gain financially if they were all beaten.
Because Harry actually broke an existing rule - whereas no rule was broken in Henderson's case.
He discussed it with Edward Gillespie who gave it his blessing. Hopefully Mr Struthers had a word in Ed's ear telling him it was none of his effing business.I was replying to your first point Luke - I don't think he's innocent though, wasn't he quoted as saying he cleared it with someone first? He knew what he was doing, he also knew that whilst it may be controversial, it wasn't a breach of the rules..
Occasionally bookmakers offer prices for a horse not to win-as things stand is this different to laying.
He discussed it with Edward Gillespie who gave it his blessing. Hopefully Mr Struthers had a word in Ed's ear telling him it was none of his effing business.
Strictly speaking, the rule says that laying a horse to lose is against the rules - suspect backing it not to win would be deemed identical.
Camilla Henderson is saying on Twitter that it was a private bet struck with a friend.
The BHA have confirmed that no action will be taken against Nicky Henderson following the trainer's revelation that he'd placed a bet on himself saddling no winners at Cheltenham.
Rule (C) 64 of the Rules of Racing states that 'A trainer must not lay with a Betting Organisation any horse under his care or control to lose a race...instruct another Person to do so, or...receive the whole or any part of any proceeds of such a lay.'
Explaining the decision not to punish the trainer, Paul Struthers, Head of Communications for the Authority, said: "Whilst no one has suggested that Nicky Henderson would have wanted to train no winners at the Cheltenham Festival, it is the Authority's view that, if the bet was placed, it was ill-judged and inappropriate.
"Having sought advice, the decision has been taken not to pursue the matter because, as the Rule is currently worded, there is unlikely to have been a breach as there was not any separate lay of each runner.
"That said, we believe that a trainer placing such a bet, however intentioned, is wrong and we will be looking to amend the relevant rules to reflect this."
What are the rules on trainers betting with unlicensed bookmakers.
TRAINER Nicky Henderson will face a BHA inquiry after one of his horses, Heather Royal, tested positive for a prohibited substance in February.
A urine sample taken after Heather Royal finished sixth in a mares only bumper at Huntingdon on February 10 revealed the presence of the prohibited substance dexamesthasone.
Henderson will face a BHA disciplinary panel on June 23 to consider if he breached the rules of racing.
The BHA reports the disciplinary panel will consider whether Henderson breached rule (C)53 of the rules of racing, in that a sample taken on course tested positive for a banned substance.
They will also consider the disqualification of Heather Royal and whether Henderson breached rule C(13) and failed to keep complete medication records.
More to follow...
Surprised no one has made more of this. I like henderson, like the way he interviews/comes across etc. BUT seriously this deserves serious attention. Its not the 1st time but the 2nd time in the last 12 MONTHS. If this happened to a smaller trainer, im sure he kitchen sink will be thrown at him.