Bachelors Hall
Conditional
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 763
I need a few things clarifying about this case.
The area where I’m happy is that Mr Gilligan knowingly and willfully ran Dubawi Phantom under a different name at a flapping/unrecognized meeting. For this reason alone, the ban is sound.
What I’m not totally clear on is the issue on running horses at flapping meets. It would presumably be easier to dope a horse to its eyeballs without detection for a flapping race or run a horse as a ringer but as far as the BHA and the Turf Club are concerned, they should be on top knowing which horse is which and what’s been through a horse’s circulatory system.
I can see that it can be a concern insofar as having a horse run its balls off days before a regulation race as that would make it a more viable lay but any horse can be strung out on the gallops at home for the same purposes. Furthermore, it is highly difficult to know which horse has run when during a charity race which often bookend regulation meetings.
What’s more, I’ve spotted this in the big book
38. Participation at unrecognised meetings
38.1 A Person must not
38.1.1 own, train or ride a horse at an unrecognised meeting in Great Britain or Ireland, or
38.1.2 act in any official capacity in connection with such a meeting.
I might be barking at the wrong tree regarding owners here but in videos I’ve seen of these flapping races, the colours are indistinguishable from those seen at regulation courses. What I can say with a greater degree of certainty is that the list of jockeys who ride or have ridden at these events read as a veritable who’s who of any name that’s ever ridden a Group/Grade One winner.
A final question probably for the pointing fans – how well regulated are p2ps and do any meetings slip under the radar?
Cheers
The area where I’m happy is that Mr Gilligan knowingly and willfully ran Dubawi Phantom under a different name at a flapping/unrecognized meeting. For this reason alone, the ban is sound.
What I’m not totally clear on is the issue on running horses at flapping meets. It would presumably be easier to dope a horse to its eyeballs without detection for a flapping race or run a horse as a ringer but as far as the BHA and the Turf Club are concerned, they should be on top knowing which horse is which and what’s been through a horse’s circulatory system.
I can see that it can be a concern insofar as having a horse run its balls off days before a regulation race as that would make it a more viable lay but any horse can be strung out on the gallops at home for the same purposes. Furthermore, it is highly difficult to know which horse has run when during a charity race which often bookend regulation meetings.
What’s more, I’ve spotted this in the big book
38. Participation at unrecognised meetings
38.1 A Person must not
38.1.1 own, train or ride a horse at an unrecognised meeting in Great Britain or Ireland, or
38.1.2 act in any official capacity in connection with such a meeting.
I might be barking at the wrong tree regarding owners here but in videos I’ve seen of these flapping races, the colours are indistinguishable from those seen at regulation courses. What I can say with a greater degree of certainty is that the list of jockeys who ride or have ridden at these events read as a veritable who’s who of any name that’s ever ridden a Group/Grade One winner.
A final question probably for the pointing fans – how well regulated are p2ps and do any meetings slip under the radar?
Cheers