Staking

Jumper

At the Start
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
11
I wondered how members approach this issue ?

I back win only up to 6/1, over that I go each way.

Also for shorter prices up to about 3/1 I put them in each way doubles on the grounds that 2 placed at say 7/4 gets your stake back.

Anyone else ?
 
Completely depends on the shape of the race for each way purposes. Number of runners, number of places, each way terms, is there a short priced favourite.

Analyse the place part of the bet separately to see if it's value: if so, bet ew, if not, don't.
 
Agreed- I try not to be too rigid about this and will back each way down to about 2/1 sometimes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I hated school and was terrible at maths so be gentle with me; I hear this angle now and again and have never understood how on earth betting a single each way at 2/1 even at quarter the odds can ever be a profitable bet??
 
I hated school and was terrible at maths so be gentle with me; I hear this angle now and again and have never understood how on earth betting a single each way at 2/1 even at quarter the odds can ever be a profitable bet??

Ok. First thing you're looking for is whether the place market is overround or overbroke (assume you're familiar with this)?

Imagine 8 runners, 1/5 the odds a place.

Your 2/1 shot, decimal odds 3. You're getting 2/5 to place, decimal odds 1.4. This implies a 71.4pc chance of placing (1 divided by 1.4 is 0.714)

Do this for all the runners and add them together. As there are three places the real life probability of all the horses placing added together should be 300pc.

If the number you get is less than 300pc this means the place market is overbroke and the odds are in your favour. The profit margin built into a market by a bookmaker has is now in your favour. The maths more often than not work out when there is a shortish priced favourite.

Let's use a realistic example market, including your 2/1 shot.

4/5
2/1
5/1
20/1
25/1
40/1
50/1
66/1

The win chances add up to 120pc - nothing out of the ordinary here, the bookie has a 20pc margin in their favour.

But the place chances add up to 272pc - i.e. Overbroke. Of course you can't just take the place part of the bet, but if you could, you could theoretically stake £272 for a guaranteed £300 return. This is what's meant by bad ew. Bets in these markets combined into multiples can be powerful compounders of value, and will often lead to account closure.

Returning to your 2/1 shot, on which you're getting 1.4 to place. Look at the betfair place market and you'd see that it's more like 1.25 to place - which shows you're getting ew value, provided you're happy with the win side of the bet.

Sorry if that's a bit long winded. I'll happily send you my spreadsheet I made for working out quickly whether a race is bad ew.
 
I have three strong fancies tomorrow. 16 , 10 , and 2/1. Is it foolish to back the three in an each way trixie? Given the price of the 2/1? The 16 + 10s chances I obviously like each way. I'm wondering what the best bet to place is. Any advice appreciated.
 
Last edited:
I have three strong fancies tomorrow. 16 , 10 , and 2/1. Is it foolish to back the three in an each way trixie? Given the price of the 2/1? The 16 + 10s chances I obviously like each way. I'm wondering what the best bet to place is. Any advice appreciated.
Check the prices in the betfair exchange place market (if its liquid??) and compare to the place prices you would get by backing each way.


As a general rule you should be backing each way in races with 8-10 runners, ideally with a short priced fav and a few big prices outsiders.



Sent from my SM-G360F using Tapatalk
 
Always compare the price to Betfair. You should spend as much time executing good bets as you should finding bets.
 
Cheers everyone.
Check the prices in the betfair exchange place market (if its liquid??) and compare to the place prices you would get by backing each way.


As a general rule you should be backing each way in races with 8-10 runners, ideally with a short priced fav and a few big prices outsiders.



Sent from my SM-G360F using Tapatalk

The feature at Carlisle (3:00) has 16 starters at present. I reckon Tamayuz Magic will run well, but could be wrong.
 
I have three strong fancies tomorrow. 16 , 10 , and 2/1. Is it foolish to back the three in an each way trixie? Given the price of the 2/1? The 16 + 10s chances I obviously like each way. I'm wondering what the best bet to place is. Any advice appreciated.

If you think they are all overpriced there is nothing wrong with putting 10-20% of your stake into an e/w trixie.
 

This fine if you've a rigid betting style and are confident in your pricing ability but its just pointless for most punters to use. I'd rather see someone bet to win a certain amount with a scale of say 200-300-500 per bet. That way you can have different confidence of bets without needing a calculator to work out your stake.

Also a sport like racing allows for a more fluid staking plan. For example I can bet 40 e/w or 400 e/w on different races on the same day. Other sports like NBA and NFL I rarely stray for 220-330-550. Its more important to work out what your staking range should be rather than tie yourself in knots on exact amounts.
 
This fine if you've a rigid betting style and are confident in your pricing ability but its just pointless for most punters to use. I'd rather see someone bet to win a certain amount with a scale of say 200-300-500 per bet. That way you can have different confidence of bets without needing a calculator to work out your stake.

Also a sport like racing allows for a more fluid staking plan. For example I can bet 40 e/w or 400 e/w on different races on the same day. Other sports like NBA and NFL I rarely stray for 220-330-550. Its more important to work out what your staking range should be rather than tie yourself in knots on exact amounts.

Betting to win a certain amount would totally wipe out my advantage as I rely on my methods beating the odds offered long term
 
Betting to win a certain amount would totally wipe out my advantage as I rely on my methods beating the odds offered long term

That's nonsensical. Once you're beating the odds you will win long term. Kelly is only optional if you can always calculate the true price which is just not possible for 99.9999% of punters to do on horse racing. It works far better on sports like NBA, NFL or especially MLB.
 
I haven't a clue which particular bet in any sequence of mine 'beats the odds ' , all I know is that over a period of time I will come out in profit.
I only bet on horse racing, so I'm afraid I can't comment on any other sport.
 
Last edited:
I haven't a clue which particular bet in any sequence of mine 'beats the odds ' , all I know is that over a period of time I will come out in profit.
I only bet on horse racing, so I'm afraid I can't comment on any other sport.

It's pretty simple. Compare your bets against the Betfair SP.
 
Overall that shows my bets are value, however I am unable to predict that on an individual bet basis. Or are you talking about comparing betfair sp against industry prices ?
 
If you're beating betfair SP on average there is no obvious reason why betting to win an amount should be better or worse than level stakes or any other staking plan.

If you established that your edge was greater on the longer priced winners then level stakes would be better than 'betting to win an amount', and vice versa.

With my own betting I seem to subconsciously tend towards betting to win an amount - I'll generally have more on the shorter the price to make the bet worthwhile. For example I might have £60 on a 20/1 shot but I wouldn't bother having £60 at evens as it'd be pointless.
 
Back
Top