• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Stewards' Cup renamed

BHA reportedly are proposing to protect the names of heritage handicaps as they do for Group races ( which i am not sure is all that strong protection if you can just give the race a different name but add as a suffix registered as the ….
 
There was already a Duke of Cambridge Handicap Stakes at the July Newmarket meeting years ago.

Yes the mal watering of courses is a more important matter but renaming is annoying.
 
Am also annoyed at losing these race names. Races should retain their historic titles whoever the current sponsor may be. At Cheltenham Festival I don't know what race I am looking at now with the almost yearly name changes. Which race is the Mildmay of Flete ?
I used to think Alfred Bartlett was some old racing bigwig from the past not a potato seller. What will it's next name be?
Permanent race names give a context and frame our appreciation of racing through the year. Otherwise it all becomes numbers like in USA.
 
There was a thing about it a few weeks ago when Richard Hughes wrote a piece in the RP saying that artificial watering was ruining courses; the BHA came out (in the RP) with self-serving stats claiming that watering was needed to prevent injuries/fatalities. Lots on Twitter about it at the time.

One of the few things I agree with Richard Hughes on - I've only ever walked p2p tracks but some of the watering on those, by CoC's with strong ties to rules courses has been nothing short of disgraceful.

Watering is a job that's exceptionally hard to do properly and as per the old BHA directive I believe should only be done to avoid abandoning meetings.

Martin
 
Last edited:
There was already a Duke of Cambridge Handicap Stakes at the July Newmarket meeting years ago.

Yes the mal watering of courses is a more important matter but renaming is annoying.

Yes and Newmarket failed to remember this and reinstate it the year they got married and Ascot stole a march on them. It was the 10f three year old handicap now known as the completely forgotten sponsor handicap
 
Back
Top