Desert Orchid
Senior Jockey
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Messages
- 25,024
Poring over yesterday's betting record got me thinking of The Fugue.
I thought going into the Oaks she didn't have a snotter's chance so I was a wee bit surprised by how well she ran and she did look a wee bit unlucky in running. The debate on the sectional times brought forward the argument that she'd run the Epsom straight faster than Camelot.
I bought it and reckoned on that basis that she was a bit of a good thing yesterday but she didn't seem to run particularly well.
I'm just wondering:
Did she have an off day yesterday?
Did it come too soon after the Oaks?
Are those sectional conclusions/interpretations inaccurate?
Have I got too much time on my hands?
I thought going into the Oaks she didn't have a snotter's chance so I was a wee bit surprised by how well she ran and she did look a wee bit unlucky in running. The debate on the sectional times brought forward the argument that she'd run the Epsom straight faster than Camelot.
I bought it and reckoned on that basis that she was a bit of a good thing yesterday but she didn't seem to run particularly well.
I'm just wondering:
Did she have an off day yesterday?
Did it come too soon after the Oaks?
Are those sectional conclusions/interpretations inaccurate?
Have I got too much time on my hands?