Comments...
My first chance to respond to some of the quite high-handed comments on here in response to my deliberately provocative outburst the other day. In addition, having heard Alan Lee's comments on ATR yesterday afternoon, I'm more convinced than ever that the decision to move the Fighting Fifth to Newbury was less a conscious decision by the BHA and more the active lobbying of a powerful trainer whose interest was undoubtedly served (though less so as it turned out) by the race being moved.
I've no problem with Nicky Henderson - I've made money from backing his horses in the past - and nor do I have any problem with him trying to secure the best deal for his owners and his horses. After all, that's why they pay him.
Nor, and I seriously resent the inference from Hamm, do I have a problem with Newbury. I have stated that Hennessy Gold Cup is a fine day with a fine card. My contention is that adding the Fighting Fifth would not have put another person on the crowd.
The BHA, it now appears, wanted to run the race at Wetherby on Saturday coming and this would have been far and away the best decision. However, they took the view (and I can understand why) that the current cold spell would be so severe and long-lasting as to make that option unworkable.
Fair enough, but why not then make some effort to give the race a chance of survival ? A magnaminous gensture could have seen Newbury lend their frost covers to Wetherby in the same way as perhaps paying for ORSIPPUS to come to Newbury would have been seen as a fair and sporting gesture.
I'm NOT against the rescheduling of races though I think the argument for moving anything other than Grade 1 and the top Grade 3 handicaps is far from convincing. In the absence of the Irish option to move whole cards, there needs to be a clear yet flexible process for determining the circumstances under which races are moved.
Had Newcastle been waterlogged rather than snowbound or had the cold spell been clearly set to end, the option of a reschedule to Wetherby would have been valid. As has been stated elsewhere, had Newbury been snowbound and Newcastle raceable on Saturday, would the Hennessy have been moved to the north-east ?
The current arrangements, while lauded by many, are far from transparent and far from consistent and of course the British weather will always dictate matters. The Tingle Creek on Saturday is looking far from secure but what are the options - a transfer to Cheltenham on the following Friday or Saturday will probably be the case but why not run it at Lingfield on the following Saturday or at Huntingdon on the Thursday ?
In any case, the guiding principles should be:
1) As far as possible, the race should be run in the same geographical area as planned.
2) ALL connections of horses entered should have the opportunity to run at the rescheduled venue with transport costs paid if required.
3) The rescheduling plan should be announced as soon as possible after the host course gives up the race.
I'm also annoyed at the conduct of some on here (including so-called "senior members") who refuse to engage in debate and seem more interested in a cynical off-hand insultiung response.
Twas ever thus....