No offence intended Trefflich - anyone who makes an opinion on what they witness is entitled to their view, and I respect yours as so expressed. In my experience, most critics merely latch onto his status as an amateur (in the traditional, corinthian sense) whenever Long Run loses, without any analysis whatsoever. His record over fences at Cheltenham and Aintree, taken in proper context, show him to be a very able rider. He is NOT the reason why Long Run has been beaten this season, and he probably won't be to blame if the horse again fails in March.
Very average amateur jockey imo. He wouldn't win half the races he's 'won' other than being up on good horses trained to the minute by the big yards in England
without the support of nicholls and mullins i would doubt if ruby would have won half the big races he has won.
without the support of nicholls and mullins i would doubt if ruby would have won half the big races he has won.
Trefflich, who are these 10 amateurs?
In no specific order:
D O'Connor, MP Fogarty, JT Carroll, JJ Codd, B O'Neill, N Carberry, K Walsh, DL Queally, JT McNamara, R Burton, JP McKeown, MJ O'Hare
Queally is one of the worst jockeys I've seen in my life, he's not even competent.
Flashback to mid summer :lol:
You could have a point with the first named, but the rest is a simple no for me. Queally is one of the worst jockeys I've seen in my life, he's not even competent.
is just saying X is the best proving anything though?..how are these judgements formed..on a couple of rides?
anyone can say x is better than y..it doesn't really mean anything without some kind of reasoning