Where's The Integrity?

M

mark

At the Start
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
215
Tony Blair was reported in the press as saying that he was not prepared to defend his integrity to the media.

A Simple question to our Prime Minister-What integrity do you think you have with The British people you were elected to represent?

Do you think you were acting with integrity as you continued to accept orders from Brussels and to impose them on the electorate, without giving them the opportunity to decide for or against? Or was it your subservience to George Bush in pleading to be allowed to go to Syria to be humiliated by them as long as The US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, was not similarly humiliated.

I could go on but I am 50 now and it is doing my blood pressure no good whatsoever. :(

For the Prime Minister of Great Britain to have sold the people he is supposed to represent to whoever is prepared to make a noiseis, in mine and many peoples view, a treasonable offence and the sooner the police feel his collar (No Chance) the better. :D

A Thought-If it had been British forces that had fired on American forces would we have classified the evidence as not reportable? I do not think so, and we would have extradited those concerned to The US at once. :(

My two eldest son's where in the army, since their discharge they have both become very politically aware, when viewing on TV the current situation in Iraq they tell me that we are doing more harm there than good, to true lads, to true. :(
 
Have there been no instances of American troops being victims of British friendly fire?
 
Originally posted by Grey@Feb 12 2007, 11:06 PM
Have there been no instances of American troops being victims of British friendly fire?
Click to expand...
Not to my knowledge Grey, on purpose, maybe. :(
 
I asked because I doubt British soldiers would he handed over to face trial. There weren't too many examples of it in Northern Ireland.
 
Why would anyone assume the British government would willingly make its soldiers face public trial in the US or anywhere else?

Putting soldiers on public trial, even within the UK, for acts carried out while on duty is a complete rarity.
 
Originally posted by Grey@Feb 13 2007, 07:38 AM
Why would anyone assume the British government would willingly make its soldiers face public trial in the US or anywhere else?
Click to expand...
Because of the "Special Relationship".
 
Isn't it time we cut the crap over the Marshall Plan? That's the real 'special' relationship, and it's well past its sell-by date. We don't ask the Poles to keep selling us food and goods cheap because we honoured our wartime pact to assist if they were invaded by the Germans, but it seems that America is a typical Indian giver, and nothing 'given' (from a big fat country not under round-the-clock bombardment or the front line of defence against the barbarism of the Nazis) is for free. We can't surely be held hostage forever to their foot-dragging reluctance to get involved and their eventual loan. The billions loaned was money already saved by the country not lifting a finger for the first two bloody years of the conflict, for God's sake! :rant:
 
Back
Top