Behind the (predictable/lovable) decidedly Ianesque nature of Ian's comment above, there's an important point that I was on the cusp of posting several times this morning and decided it wasn't valuable to say.
But actually, it
might be valuable for some. And that point (or those points) is/are for anyone thinking of taking advantage of this (paid) service or, indeed, any other similar.
(Note: that's patently
not (and never would be) going to be any of the regular posters here, but it
might be some who prefer just to read and take it all in, especially if any are newer to the game).
You might have valid reasons for doing so. You might
think you need this sort of stuff. You might 'just' not have the time to dyor. You might think it's the dog's bollocks. You might even have had some winners on the back of it (though I'd suggest that nothing I've ever seen on it so far did actually name a winner, but probably there were one or two).
For info of its type, and fwiw, I'd say this is one of the better ones
I've seen.
But...
- If you know horses and horse racing, or are prepared to work at it and have the time to 'know' horses and horse racing, you 100% don't need it (as Slim indicated some 20 posts back).
- You'll get a lot more pleasure/satisfaction from working it out yourself (though there are paid services involving the use of data in different ways which can help contribute towards that pleasure/satisfaction).
- You'll get better chances of backing winners (for free) just by following the thoughts/selections of several members here.
- Indeed, there are multiple ways to identify your own (potentially winning) bets in a fraction of the time without trawling through reams of 'trend-based' heavy wording based on someone else's opinions (though, again note, using trend-based data yourself to identify bets that others might not identify can have its value).
All that said, it would be interesting to hear from anyone who does pay for a service like this, explaining why.
Maybe there are some valid thought processes I'm missing.
But - on the face of it - it just can't be about winner volume or profits, because there
isn't (and never will be) a service (that doesn't involve your own thoughts and knowledge, or others free thoughts and knowledge) that will give anyone anything more than noted above.