Why is running a novice in the Gold Cup such a bad thing? Especially since Beef Or Salmon's 4 victories as a "novice" prior to the Gold Cup were in open company?
Captain Christy was a novice in the Gold Cup and it didn't do him much harm did it? And until he fell fatally, Gloria Victis had run very well, and may even have won.
Often trainers have stated that the Gold Cup, particularly a sub-standard one, is a preferred route rather than the Sun Alliance which is considered a very hard race. I think it is probably asking a lot of a novice to take on really good animals, such as Denman or Kauto Star for instance.
But if you look back at some ot the poorer Gold Cups you do wonder if the top novice chaser of that year would have won the Gold Cup - Killiney 1973, Tied Cottage 1976, The West Awake 1988, Garrison Savannah 1990, Minnehoma 1992, Florida Pearl 1998, Looks Like Trouble/Nick Dundee 1999, Star De Mohaison 2006, Trabolgan 2005 and Denman 2007
I do wonder if those who are against running novices in the Gold Cup are influenced by the tragedy of Gloria Victis rather than having any real evidence to support the view that the Gold Cup is anymore harmful on a novice, either physically or mentally, than any other open Steeplechase. I agree pitching one in against seriously top class animals is not an ideal route, but if a field looks sub-standard then there is probably some merit in having a go.