• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Articles the Racing Post put behind a paywall that you'd want paying to read....

I was told about this a few days ago and given a name, but the Law degree and the old libel Law ex-journalist knowledge kept me schtum about it.

I think the name I was given has denied it's him since.

I've never met the bloke whose name I was given, but I've never liked the sound of him, or the persona he projects, one bit.

I doubt I'd much like the person (whoever that might be) who has actually been arrested either.

Not that they'd care.

All credit to Slim for drawing attention to a RP story they absolutely buried.
 
I’m guessing it’s the guy who once posted a picture of a car handbrake being pulled the day he landed a touch.
 
Very few people in racing and betting truly understand the Law, and even fewer in the Police force understand racing and betting and how it relates to the Law.

As a Law graduate, since 1984 I have watched in disbelief as cases that never had a hope have unravelled.

Making accusations stick requires evidence of proof and too many of the above just don't know what that is in this scenario.

The RFO case few will remember, the Top Cees case, Fallon - all cases they would never have happened if everyone understood the Law.

To prove a race was fixed you need evidence of a plot - wheeling out "experienced race readers" who say a horse was a non-trier is NOT evidence, it's some anorak's opinion.

Evidence is things like text transcripts or recordings of a plot being hatched, records of transactions, stuff that gets people bang to rights.

I won't be holding my breath on this leading to anything tbh - an arrest is just an arrest, the CPS decide if someone should be charged, not the Police, and even if there are, if it's a criminal, not civil, case a Judge can throw it out for lack of evidence before it even comes to trial.

I'd bet 1.01 that I and many others know who it is, but so what? It's not like we can have a bet on it.

I can wait until details emerge as the whole thing progresses.
 
Common sense should tell you that a legal case needs actual evidence not subjective opinion, well unless someone thinks you've said hurty words
 
Breaking news: Police today moved to arrest the ring leaders of an organisation causing criminal damage to a number of high street bookmakers. Operating under the cover of a well known horse racing site, which is devoted to talking about horses but cannot be named for legal reasons.

The ring leaders, too, cannot be named. The IDentity of one is well known in racing circles, another looked far from overweight as he was taken away, whilst one wailed. “but I never go inside”, together with another proclaiming “alas poor me”. Most went quietly, but the police had trouble with a really tough one.
 
Last edited:
Breaking news: After interrogation of the syndicate members police realised that the figure man did recently abandon, or kid the police into so thinking, the syndicate and they have issued an international arrest warrant
 
Very few people in racing and betting truly understand the Law, and even fewer in the Police force understand racing and betting and how it relates to the Law.

As a Law graduate, since 1984 I have watched in disbelief as cases that never had a hope have unravelled.

Making accusations stick requires evidence of proof and too many of the above just don't know what that is in this scenario.

The RFO case few will remember, the Top Cees case, Fallon - all cases they would never have happened if everyone understood the Law.
I wonder if that race is available on youtube.
When the horse won at Cheltenham a few years later Linda Ramsden refused to give Tommo an interview but Barry Fenton willingly obliged Robert Hall on RTE Racing highlights.
He explained how as the horse loved being covered up he stuck to the inside rail and Top Cees ran into every gap as it presented itself and won easily.
Armed with that knowledge watching the Newmarket race makes interesting viewing from what I recall of it.
 
I watched the 1995 Swaffham Handicap on TV in the Wapping offices of TODAY newspaper along with my former Raceform and there colleague Henry Rix (genuinely good bloke Henry, imo, probably my all-time favourite posh boy tbf, though admittedly against less-than-stiff competition) and the Ramsden's son who was also on the racing desk.

Henry watched the race, then turned to face Ramsden and said: "What did you make of that?"

Ramsden's eyes remained fixed on the screen, he grimaced slightly, and replied: "Yeah, didn't look too good, did it?"

I said nothing, but me and Henry said a fair bit to each other later on after Ramsden had wandered off somewhere.

But it's a game of opinions, we all have them, and even the most experienced race reader's doesn't mean "Jack" in a court of Law.

It simply isn't proof, as The (spectacularly legally-ignorant) Sporting Life found out to their wholly-predictable cost.

The 1995 Swaffham Handicap:

The 1995 Chester Cup:
 
Last edited:
'Jumps racing needs it's own Champions League' is todays behind a paywall offering

So are we having groups stages, a last 32, last 16, quarters, semis and a final?

There's another bewdy, as the Don would say:ROFLMAO:
 
Jumps racing needs: better prize money to encourage more people to own horses and fewer fixtures and races.

It needs some gimmick that deflects from those harsh truths like it needs a hole in the head.

More money I've saved by not paying to read this nonsense.
 
Gimmicks smack of cluelessness and/or desperation and/or avoiding the obvious issues.


Prize money is one thing to encourage more people to own horses, ytd median prize money in UK has been £8362 where as in IRE it has been £9711, a 16% increase, however the UK has held approx 3.5 times as many races than IRE this year giving more opportunities to win prize money.

Personally I think horse racing as it is now is going to wither on the vine as the public perception solidifies that bookies will ban anyone that even might win, so people will take their money elsewhere and only part of the betting money will go to such as exchanges and the tote.
The bookies won't mind as long as much money as possible goes to fobts, casinos betting and cartoon racing where they are in complete control.

Using new legislation when people try to withdraw winnings, bookies are well armed to basically be even bigger cnts that won't countenance anyone even looking like they'll win despite their overround margins being indifferent to who has placed the money. Note the overrounds in IRE are more in the bookies favour than in the UK. The median overround in the UK YTD is 115.73 , where as in IRE it is 123.04

There was instance this week that went viral on X re AK bets binning someone over getting a bet on at 11/2 before they'd shifted their price to more like 7/2 as per the rest of the market, all for betting about £25, hardly rick of the century !

I watched a podcast the bookie was on afterwards and he did himself no favours.

Was quite telling how he isn't interested in having even marginal accounts because of admin costs.

If you are on course and you fancy a horse and you see it shortening , you are going to go with the board that hasn't shortened yet and he basically just doesn't accept that situation online.

Of course the RP won't go into any of this re bookmaker practices cos their arses have been bought and paid for by the bookmaking fraternity via the amount they make via advertising and click throughs from the website to bookmaker sites.
It reminds me of a line in "Withnail and I" , ten bob a tit and fiver for their arse.
 
Last edited:
Moray Smith
This youngster was absolutely brilliant at the Cheltenham Festival last season - and he's value to strike there again
Pro punter Moray Smith with his weekly betting advice

Pro punter Moray Smith has joined the Racing Post as a new columnist for the jumps season and will be sharing the insight gained from nearly two decades of battling the bookmakers

Wham! Bam! Thank you, Ma’am! Don’t you just love the start of the Cheltenham Festival? The roar that greets the best two-mile novice hurdlers as they set off in the Supreme, immediately followed by the spectacle of the fastest novice chasers battling it out in the Arkle. Shishkin loved it so much that he came back to win an Arkle 12 months after his last-gasp triumph in the Supreme.

You might have read previously that ante-post betting, particularly on the Cheltenham Festival, is very much my speciality and I want to focus on the Arkle.

This has always been one of my favourite races of the festival, although, as Forrest Gump might say, it’s like a box of chocolates – you never know what you’re going to get. We’ve had the sublime – Douvan, Altior, Sprinter Sacre – but we’ve also seen renewals like 2019, when the first three – Duc Des Genievres, Us And Them and Articulum – raced 50 times subsequently for a single win in a French conditions hurdle.

The reason for such a mixed bag is the specialised nature of the race. The pace is usually on from the moment the tapes go up, and the pool of novices capable of excelling over Cheltenham’s fences, while coping with the undulations and atmosphere, is limited. If a horse wins an Arkle impressively, get your betting boots on early for the following season’s Champion Chase.

Trainers are understandably keen to give their horses, especially their two-milers, a nice introduction to their new discipline and Arkle runners have often spent their nascent chasing careers in small-field, slowly run races that culminate in burn-ups, so it should come as no surprise that falls and race-changing errors frequently occur at these closing fences.

For punters, there can be lots to learn from those sit-and-sprint prep runs, looking at how their jumping stands up when they’re flat out. After all, if they can’t sort their feet out in the trial races when the pressure is on, what are their chances of meeting every fence at the festival on a good stride? The Arkle is indeed a very different test, and one very few pass with flying colours.

When looking at the race with a view to finding ante-post bets, the first thing on my mind is the need for speed. Look at the greatest Arkle winner of recent times – Sprinter Sacre. The clue there was that he’d been the fastest horse in the previous year’s Supreme, despite fading up the hill to finish third.

Sprinter Sacre (Barry Geraghty) jumps the last and wins the Racing Post Arkle13.3.12 Pic:Edward Whitaker
Sprinter Sacre was an impressive winner of the Arkle
Credit: Edward Whitaker (racingpost.com/photos)
Similarly, Douvan won only one race beyond about two miles, a Clonmel Oil Chase, and Altior was barely even tested beyond that trip. Yes, last year’s race was won by a staying type in Jango Baie, but that was because nothing could jump well enough to put the race to bed. Nicky Henderson said afterwards he’d never run at two miles again. Why? Because he knows he’s not fast enough and the Arkle just fell into his lap.

So, where does that leave us in terms of next March?

Two trainers, Henderson and Willie Mullins, have dominated the race in recent years, winning 11 of the last 14 runnings, and they train the two horses currently dominating the ante-post markets: Lulamba and Kopek Des Bordes. They’re two very different types of horse.

Lulamba went agonisingly close to winning the Triumph Hurdle in March, but that race, run over an extended two miles on Cheltenham’s New course, suits juveniles with a blend of speed and stamina and I’m concerned Lulamba doesn’t possess enough natural speed to win a good Arkle – and the 2026 running could be just that.

Kopek Des Bordes crosses the line ahead of William Munny
Kopek Des Bordes: won the Supreme Novices' Hurdle at the 2025 Cheltenham Festival
Credit: Patrick McCann (racingpost.com/photos)
Kopek Des Bordes, on the other hand, has got so much natural speed that Mullins is hoping that putting a line of fences in front of him will slow him down! It’s not often I see a performance that leaves me lost for words afterwards, but I saw one at the Dublin Racing Festival when he was running away with Paul Townend against Grade 1 horses yet still found more when asked and hit the line hard.

He showed good speed again when travelling strongly to win the Supreme, over the same Old course that stages the Arkle, before finishing the season on a disappointing note at Punchestown. If he can jump – and he certainly looks like a chaser – then the Arkle is his to lose.

Looking down the list of bookmakers’ prices, it’s easy to spot several horses unlikely to line up: Anzadam, William Munny, The New Lion, Constitution Hill and Irancy are all expected to remain over hurdles, while Game Of Inches, Brighterdaysahead and Kawaboomga all look like they might need further.

Salvator Mundi is next among those likely to target the race. He’s another with speed to burn and brings strong novice hurdle form to the table, so if fences can put manners on him then he could be a live one at a nice price. He looks like a poor man’s Kopek Des Bordes to me, though – he is even more free-going than his stablemate, doesn’t finish his races as strongly and hasn’t achieved the same level of form. He has potential but I much prefer Kopek Des Bordes.

Romeo Coolio has finished behind both horses as a novice hurdler and looks likely to continue to fall a little short at the top level. I’m more interested in another Mullins runner, this year's County Hurdle winner Kargese. She's another strong traveller and looks well suited to two miles. That County wasn’t the most strongly run but she showed a lovely turn of foot when sweeping into the lead after the third-last hurdle and plenty of resolution to keep the chasing pack at bay. She put in an excellent effort to finish third behind State Man and Golden Ace at Punchestown, too. She still has plenty of improvement in her and could be a major player with her mares’ allowance.

Mullins has yet to commit her to chasing, but he says he wants to keep her and Jade De Grugy apart, with one going chasing and the other possibly targeting the Mares’ Hurdle. Kargese is a keen-going sort who has never raced beyond 2m1f, whereas Jade De Grugy has won five times over the 2m4f of the Mares’ Hurdle. Surely that’s the way to go.

Anyone looking further down the list of Arkle hopefuls is casting their net into very choppy waters. One or two will inevitably earn invitations to the party in March, but I’d be surprised if the next Arkle winner hasn’t already been mentioned.

Now, how do you play the ante-post market bearing in mind all of that?

Being successful at the punting game is all about finding value. My approach has remained the same since I set out to make my living from betting on horses nearly 20 years ago. I price up the race myself and only bet when bookmakers or the exchanges are offering me at least 20 per cent above my price. My current Arkle prices are: 11-4 Kopek Des Bordes, 5 Lulamba, 8 Kargese, 10 Salvator Mundi, 12 Romeo Coolio, 5-2 the field.

Kargese wins the County Hurdle at the Cheltenham Festival
Kargese: County Hurdle winner is another Arkle contender for Willie Mullins
Credit: John Grossick (racingpost.com/photos)
This represents a 100 per cent book, which is essential if your prices are to make any sense and provide a basis for trading. At the current prices, I’m happy to back all the above horses except for Lulamba. My approach means I place a lot of Cheltenham bets, approaching 1,000 each year at my peak. It’s not an approach that works for everyone – managing all my positions when the festival arrives leaves me with the headache of Oliver Reed the morning after the office Christmas party, but it works for me. For those with limited supplies of paracetamol, I suggest you limit yourselves to Kopek Des Bordes for now and Kargese the moment Mullins gives chasing the green light.

Kopek Des Bordes epitomises one of my golden rules about betting on the Cheltenham Festival and that is the best time to bet is as close as possible to the previous year’s meeting. My betting slips show he was still available at 7-1 in May. Unfortunately, that price is long gone, with 4-1 the best you’ll get now after those greedy bookmakers spent the summer trimming the fat off their juiciest prices, but I wouldn’t be happy offering anything over 11-4 if I were on the other side of the fence.

The final piece of the ante-post jigsaw is deciding whether to bet win-only or each-way. For some folk, it purely comes down to the price. 3-1? Win. 20-1? Each-way. But it’s far more nuanced than that, a subject I will return to in future articles, and for now I will simply point out that the Arkle is often a good race for each-way bets, although it has been incredibly frustrating for me over the years. When you’ve snaffled all the big each-way prices while the bookmakers are still offering three places and only five go to post on the day, it really isn’t much fun watching your horse finish fourth.

Saint Calvados at 16-1 in 2018, Allmankind at the same price in 2021 and L’Eau Du Sud this year still keep me awake at night. What are the chances of Kargese bringing up an unwelcome four-timer next March? Let’s not jinx it.
 
A full page in today's Racing Post tipping up a horse at 4/1 that he makes 11/4. You only have to wait 18 weeks and 5 days to collect.

I've yet to see one of these clowns tackle the fact that there is a higher opportunity cost in tying up endless funds ante-post when there are several winners to be backed this weekend. To me it's pure ego and public flexing.

Unless you think the horse is going off odds-on, then for f%*&’s sake go find a winner today.
 
I'd never heard of Moray Smith (not that he'd care, he's probably never heard of me either) prior to him joining the Racing Post.

That's not significant in itself, I keep myself to myself and there's loads of people in the racing and betting game I've never heard of (and don't much want to).

But I struggle with successful pro punting and an obsession with the Cheltenham Festival because it doesn't fit anything I've seen in my many years on the periphery of the game.

What it does do is play to the tired old racing media narrative that the entire Jumps season revolves around 28 races in March.

Good luck to the fella if he makes his betting pay - no skin off my nose either way - but, if he does, why does he require employment off the Racing Post?

Treat with caution - if they're any good, they exit the racing media (or were never in it in the first place), not join it.
 
I think the obsession with Cheltenham is really unhealthy for racing. It shows no sign of lessening, more’s the pity. Maybe they and the local hoteliers will price themselves out of the game in competition with other festivals. I reckon if I come back to life in twenty years time I’d find the Dublin and Punchestown festivals holding sway with Cheltenham struggling to live on its history.
 
I agree with Slim , talking about getting 4/1 on something he sees as 11/4 in a good 4 months time doesn't fill one with confidence re what his output is going to be like, if he saw something being evens then ok.

Cheltenham is just one meeting and probably some of the most analysed races all year, so therefore likely harder to spot something others haven't.
Personally I don't get the hype and it's getting silly, I'd rather do a mon night at windsor in the summer with good company than be crushed among a load of booze and coke heads in March & paying stupid prices for what exactly?

You might be in + at the end of the year consistenly but by how much compared to your material needs, also it can be very up and down along the way, so there is logic in having more than one income stream if you're not single just living in some rented flat i.e. eggs and baskets
 
Last edited:
There are races today where horses could halve in price at any stage. Yet we get 1,600 words from some c*** explaining why Sprinter Sacre won the Arkle and why an Arkle winner might have a good chance in the following year's Champion Chase. Does he understand his audience is supposed to be sophisticated racing people? It reads like Cheltenham for Dummies.

I've honestly never seen such a load of bollocks printed in the racing press — and that’s a f$%^ing low bar to slide under.
 
Precious few
I think the obsession with Cheltenham is really unhealthy for racing. It shows no sign of lessening, more’s the pity. Maybe they and the local hoteliers will price themselves out of the game in competition with other festivals. I reckon if I come back to life in twenty years time I’d find the Dublin and Punchestown festivals holding sway with Cheltenham struggling to live on its history.
100 % agree. Thousands going to punchestown and Dublin that used to go to Cheltenham. The obsession with Cheltenham is sooo frustrating. Races like the fighting fifth hurdle use to be great races with horses like birds nest,ekbalco etc regularly turning up. Let each race stand out on its own.
 
Remarkable from the Racing Post. Front page screaming “I genuinely think she could be one of the best” — then you open the stable tour and the quote doesn’t exist. Not a word of it. They just made a headline out of thin air. Classic RP.
 
1,600 words plus is the easiest way to lose the interest of the reader. It should be far less, have a beginning(or introduction), a middle and an end (or conclusion). When I write up point to point reports, I try to start off with a brief paragraph of the main events, followed by what I think is the most deserving race story. And then sometimes I like to play around linking paragraphs so if a veteran horse has won a race then a veteran jockey has won another, I follow on (if that makes sense). It's a way of trying to engage the reader and make it interesting. We are now limited to 1,000 words which can be difficult but I think correct.
 

Recent Blog Posts

Back
Top