Grasshopper
Senior Jockey
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 16,014
Prompted by Maruco's suggestion that Henry de Bromhead is a "much better" trainer of chasers than Willie Mullins (I personally don't agree), is it possible that some of the major training operations are just too big to do justice to all of the horses in their care?
A Mullins or a Nicholls have all mod cons at their disposal, and theoretically horses in their care should benefit the most, but is there a case to be made for instead having your horse with a smaller trainer, where it can receive more niche attention - even if money is no object?
Do we think some horses of lesser-quality in bigger yards are perhaps penalised in some way, due to most of the focus being on the stars?
A Mullins or a Nicholls have all mod cons at their disposal, and theoretically horses in their care should benefit the most, but is there a case to be made for instead having your horse with a smaller trainer, where it can receive more niche attention - even if money is no object?
Do we think some horses of lesser-quality in bigger yards are perhaps penalised in some way, due to most of the focus being on the stars?
Last edited: