Would Dobbin have wanted to win in such circumstances? His last ride will be forever be associated with suggestions that he was allowed to win the race. The authorities need to tell jocks in races where one of the weighing room stalwarts is riding for the last time, that they are all going to be watched closely.Originally posted by Headstrong@Apr 10 2008, 02:36 PM
would you have wanted your horse in that race, knowing the jock would be a pariah in the Weighing Room if he got past Dobbo?
You'd rather the game was bent? Ace.Originally posted by jft2005@Apr 10 2008, 07:45 PM
there is no way mccallister was going to ruin the day for dobbin, id have done the same.
People throw out the argument that racing doesn't need this and it leaves a sour taste and calls integrity into question. The very same people new this was highly likely in advance and weren't left to try and figure it out after the race. I applaud racing for giving it's stalwarts a fitting send-off. Tony Dobbin was a shining example for any young jockey and those who object to this should go and get a life.
Absolutely correct, the kid was put in a terrible position. apparently he's only won 2 races... ! He said today in the RP that his horse is 17.2 and needs a lot of organising, that they hit the 3rd last and he toruble getting him together again.Originally posted by Maruco@Apr 11 2008, 08:43 AM
McAllister was left in an unenviable position for such a young jockey when his mount had more or less taken him to a winning postion and you have to feel a little sorry for him. He'd have been lynched in the dressing room if his horse had got his nose in front.
...... and given it was patently obvious that this would happen barring a fall any punter who backed against it shouldn't be let near a betting shop or and exchange website for there own financial wellbeing.
Sense spoken.Originally posted by Warbler@Apr 11 2008, 04:13 PM
McAllister was doubtless put in an invidious position (but then a 15 point deduction, chronic mis-management, the sale players, and crippling debts have all brought this about).
Bookies? well they could have refused to take the bet, and set up a 'without' market only.
Punters wanting to back something else, could have placed a Tote forecast to enhance their pay out.
I do remember however, that one of the principal defensive lines that the industry trotted out during the last round of race fixing allegations was that it would be "impossible" to fix a race due to the sheer number of people that it would require to comply and co-operate. I fear we might have seen that line well and truly exposed now, (although few of us believed it I suspect anyway).
At the end of the day, rules are rules and I don't really see they can be waived just because an interest group wish to conspire to ensure a stalwart jockey wins his last race. Will this become the norm? essentially nothing more than a football testimonial match, or cricketing benefit match. A simple exhibition of jumping to say thankyou?
In truth, Dobbin could have removed the pressure from McAllister and all other jockeys and other owners by simply climbing off his last winner and announcing his retirement on the spot with immediate effect (obviously there would be ways of doing this properly by making reasonable contingency) but so long as it was kept in a close circle of people it would probably have been fairer all round
You'd rather the game was bent? Ace. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Ricko+Apr 10 2008, 09:53 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ricko @ Apr 10 2008, 09:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jft2005@Apr 10 2008, 07:45 PM
there is no way mccallister was going to ruin the day for dobbin, id have done the same.