Gary Glitter

Copyright 1997 by Claus Blume All Rights Reserved

Blume-in hell !!!

I know his brother SANTA CLAUSE!!! :lol:


Das Lederhosen Museum
Copyright 1997 by Claus Blume All Rights Reserved

Sorry my wit you fail to appreciate??????????????????? :rolleyes: :teeth:
 
Originally posted by BrianH@Nov 20 2005, 05:39 PM
Hey, everyone, I'm in jinnyj's fantasies!!!
Click to expand...
No - you're not quite up there with Hugh Jackman and Johnny Depp but post up a piccie of your good self in the Swiss gear and you never know! :D
 
Originally posted by Colin Phillips@Nov 20 2005, 07:03 PM
We need an emoticon of a little man shaking his head in disbelief! :what:
Click to expand...
Er, will this do?
th_smilie_tanz.gif
 
Originally posted by krizon@Nov 19 2005, 11:59 PM
So what would you do to female paedophiles, SL? The sexual molestation of small children (and, yes, even babies) isn't the sole preserve of the maladjusted male. In the interest of bringing some semblance of balance to the argument re. punishment, one has to bring in the Rosemary Wests, the Myra Hindleys, and the hundreds of women who gratify their urges at the cost of their own children as much as anyone else's.

What does the panel consider is a just punishment for the man or woman who forces an incestuous relationship upon their children? There are plenty enough cases of mothers who have masturbated their young sons for years (although, like PDJ, I don't want to put more detail on here about other perversities) and wrecked their heads.

By the time you decide to nip 'n' tuck the offenders, it's already far too late. You need a proactive, not a reactive, system. But I don't see one happening, unless there is a fault in the genetic system of such offenders, as there is a mental one in psychopaths, and so on. So that brings us to genetic engineering and tweaking the gene that's causing the problem - I assume all children would have to be tested for this faulty gene, in case they carried it. If they did, they could be either 'corrected' or, presumably (taking some people's desire for legalized murder into account), they would have to be tastefully euthanized so that they couldn't grow into a potentially harmful adult.

"I'm sorry, Mrs Smith, but little Chantelle is likely to rape her children, so we'll have to take her away to be fixed."

"But she's only 18 months old!"

"Yes, but we have to do it now. Of course, if you'd prefer to sign her up, we are looking for infants to harvest lungs and kidneys from just now..."
Click to expand...
Kri, I realise that castration is not a practical or civilised solution - I agree more that more should be done with respect to child abusers & a harder line should be taken. I also know full well that women can be as bad as men - Rosemary West & Myra Hindley were pure evil & I find it incredible that thoughts were entertained as to whether they should have been released or not. Rose West got off on her husband's sexual depravity herself & helped him out with his fantasies! I think paedophiles should be locked up for life, and life should damn well mean life, not 8 years & out on "good behaviour". Good behaviour? The inmate doesn't molest his cell mate? Is that about it?

As for rehabilitation, there are certain types that will never be rehabilitated; paedos, psychopaths, sexual monsters for example. These people should never se the light of day after they are caught.
 
From the Guardian online:

Glitter 'pays families of accusers'

Staff and agencies
Wednesday December 28, 2005

The disgraced rock star Gary Glitter paid more than £2,000 to the families of two under-age Vietnamese girls he is accused of sexually abusing, it was reported today.
Glitter gave £1,100 each to the families of the 11 and 12-year-old girls he allegedly had sex with, his lawyer said.

Last week, both families were reported to have written letters to the court asking for the case against the 70s' star to be dropped.

The reported payments are equivalent to around three times the average annual wage in Vietnam.

"If we pay the money for the two families, when this case goes to court maybe Mr Gary will receive a lighter penalty," Glitter's attorney, Le Thanh Kinh, said.

"After receiving the money, they informed the investigation bureau that they don't want to go to court and they want to drop the case."

Prosecutors in Vietnam said the money would have no bearing on whether the case went to trial.

However, the court could consider it as a form of compensation during the sentencing phase, the deputy provincial chief prosecutor, Nguyen Van Xung, said.

"It will not affect the investigation and the trial process, but the court may consider it as one factor to lessen the sentence," he added.

Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was arrested last month at Tan Son Nhat international airport in Ho Chi Minh City as he tried to leave Vietnam.

The 61-year-old had left his rented home in the southern resort of Vung Tau amid allegations about his relationships with two teenage girls.

He was taken back to Vung Tau for further investigation by the police, and has been detained in a regional prison on suspicion of engaging in obscene acts with a child - a charge punishable by up to 12 years in prison.

Police completed their investigation into the case this week, and handed over their conclusions to Glitter and his lawyer today.

The campaign group, Fair Trials Abroad, condemned the payments and described them as "shameful".

Prosecutors have said they are likely to charge Glitter with engaging in lewd acts with a child. Police investigators said there was not enough evidence to press child rape charges - which carry a maximum penalty of death by firing squad - against Glitter.

Glitter, who found fame as a flamboyant glam rocker, was convicted of possessing child pornography in Britain in 1999, and served half of a four-month jail term before being released.

He later went to Cambodia and was permanently expelled in 2002, but Cambodian officials did not specify any crime or file charges.
 
Originally posted by Maurice@Dec 28 2005, 04:32 PM
What a sad indictment of that country's justice system.
Click to expand...
Not at all - the police say that there is not enough evidence to pursue the child rape charges, but they are pressing all other charges.

I would condemn the justice system of those countries where charges, and convictions, are brought without evidence. Even more so where punishment is meted out without trial.
 
It comes across in the media as though a deal has been struck to pay off the families. If that is the case then I stand by my comment. If I'm wrong then I withdraw the remark.
 
If you read the report above you'll see that the money paid does not affect the chrges brough, though could mitigate the sentrence.

The lack of evidence for rape predates any revelation of payments.
 
I can't see that in the report. I can't see any mention of the lack of evidence prior to the families being paid.

I do see monies being paid then charges being dropped.

Tell me where I'm reading it wrong.
 
You're not. This is the first report about money being paid. Previous reports going back more than a fortnight told us that there was insufficient evidence to bring the rape charges. I can understand why you may not have read them - they make me sick too.
 
Now I've just heard on the BBC news that the payments were also made over two weeks ago and the dropping of the rape charges arose subsequently, so you are right in your assumption. It seems that the press were told about one and not the other until now, so reporting of the payments was separated from the reporting of only the lesser charges being made.
 
Disgusting, this really makes me sick. The man is a dirty, filthy paedo and he walks - revolting. I hope he gets his comeuppance soon.
 
How do the parents of those girls sleep at night? If any man did to any of my girls what Garry Glitter is supposed to have done, I'd shoot him myself. How can they not want justice for what he did? I realise that the sum he paid to them equates to about three times the average annual wage over there but didn't they want to see him get what he deserves? :(
 
The payments simply mean he MAY receive a lighter sentence (than 12 years) IF the case goes to court. Only if the case does not reach court, does he walk.

Griffin, I'm not trying to sound like a schoolmarm here, but we are a world made up of many differences - we all know about our religious differences, class systems, and so on. What some folks don't realize is that it wasn't until relatively recently that we began to view our own children AS children, and not tiny versions of adults who could be worked all day, any day, for pennies; live in filth and squalor, be beaten, starved, injured or killed during their hard work, and even sentenced to jail or death for relatively petty crimes.

Children used to be sold within our society, and thousands disappeared into various forms of 'service', including being procured for sexual gratification. It is incredible to think that today they still are, and that the Anti-Slavery Society still exists, since child slavery thrives in several African countries. Over-populated low-caste Indian families still sell their surplus children as skivvies-for-life to the rich high-caste, and it is an open secret throughout much of the Asian world that both boys and girls are used in their thousands for the sexual gratification of men. Girls may start at 10, with more being paid for a 'first timer'. Don't forget, they're still being legally married-off in many countries at that age! Of course their families know about it, but because of the lack of family planning (often because of 'tradition' or enforced by governments or religious edicts) they feel that any income is good income.

When you see the figures - a sum that BrianH lights his Havanas with on a good day at the track - equalling a whole year's hard work for a poor Vietnamese family with probably many children to support, it makes sense to say 'yes', since the families would have little chance in court up against a rich man's lawyers, doctors, and paid 'friends' to speak well of him. When the world's managed to even out its economies a lot more fairly, we may see less of children being available to service the sexual whims of paying adults. I ain't holding my breath...
 
and even if they skin him alive,the family will still be bernie flint.

I would take him for every cent that he has.

Give him 25 years nick and a year off for every £10000 he finds.

Give the money to the girls.
 
Back
Top