EC21
Conditional
This might sound really silly but I have had this on my mind a bit. I haven't researched it so if it sounds daft then so be it. When watching races in heavy ground, or really soft, the winner, if in front all the way, is not caked in mud. So surely a horse held up caked in mud has carried more weight than it was allotted? My idea is to look for a horse that was held up caked in mud that finishes second has run above its level and is worth watching for a race or two in future. It must be ahead of its mark surely? Thoughts on this? What a great time of the year to ask this when the ground is drying up
. I don't have access to a database at moment, will have to sort that, but even with one it might be hard to put in a query. To anyone who works in racing, what extra weight would someone think a horse + jockey, buried in mud, has carried in extra in weight? Just a topic for chat that might interest, or maybe not.
Not exactly the same, but a few years ago I noticed that a horse who ran near the rail on the far side at Exeter were running on a lot slower ground than those on the outer. Looks like a bit of a camber on that course on the far side. I noted horses who ran well on that slower side and had some success when they ran again.
Main question though is, does being buried in mud add much weight to the jockey or horse?

Not exactly the same, but a few years ago I noticed that a horse who ran near the rail on the far side at Exeter were running on a lot slower ground than those on the outer. Looks like a bit of a camber on that course on the far side. I noted horses who ran well on that slower side and had some success when they ran again.
Main question though is, does being buried in mud add much weight to the jockey or horse?
Last edited: