My immediate impression is that this might be the most competitive renewal for many years.
...
I'm wondering if I've ever had so many you could fancy to win a normal renewal. I'll check back through my files and see.
I've now checked back through a few things.
Firstly, it does look like a ridiculously competitive renewal. By that, I mean I have a notional idea of what kind of mark it takes to win an average race. Most years, the Hennessy looks like requiring a bit more than that to win, which is usually how it ends up. This year the number of entries with prospects of posting a mark beyond the average is greater than in any of my records so whatever emerges ahead of that lot will have to be incredibly well handicapped in the general scheme of things.
Secondly, this is the lowest class [going into the race] Hennessy for some years. The top weights at this stage this year, Houblon Des Obeaux and Triolo D'Alene, will race off 157 (and not the 155 published). That's the lowest since Cornish Rebel headed the card on 153 in 2006, the year after RSA winner Trabolgan topped the weights on 151. The average rating of the first six in 2006, won by State Of Play, was just 137 which happens to be the rating of the bottom weight this time. In between we've had Denman running off 182!
I'm not a great one for stats in these big races. As I've said before there is only one stat that matters: the winner is always very well handicapped. It doesn't matter what weight it has to carry so long as it is being asked to carry a lot less than its ability merits. Denman won it off 161 in 2007.
Djakadam may well be very leniently weighted but it isn't evident on his public form so I wouldn't be rushing in at the price. I backed Lord Windermere in this last year as an RSA winner likely to turn up in the Gold Cup but off 154 in this. He disappointed.