It just struck me when reading into the topic a bit more that that could make some serious problems for trainers whose main ethic isn't gambling. I've also spoken to young jockeys who are collared by professional gamblers for free entry badges as their 'guests'. The jockeys don't seem to realise that once these people are seen as attachments to them, they will be forever associated with them. If in future these dodgy geezers are investigated or banned from entry, inevitably there will be an eyebrow raised about the jockeys who appear to be their mates, even if they're not and all they've done is obtain them free entrance to courses.
I'm surprised that the PJA doesn't pay more attention to this sort of thing, and that the NTF doesn't perhaps take a more serious stance about jockeys who deliberately disobey trainers' instructions. I know trainers have the right to not engage them again, but without any sort of penalty involved, the habit can go on and on to everyone's detriment except the people who want a different result.
Maybe it's time for the PJA and NTF to work more closely together and perhaps, if there is the will to carry the issue forward, advise the BHA that they want stronger penalties where jockeys fail to do as instructed. If that means that trainers log in a brief of their instructions along with their final decs, then fine. Then there's no argument. Would that happen, I wonder?