The media will be rolling in ecstasy at this story - probably they find the bodies coming almost too quickly, since it doesn't leave enough time between them for them to headline 'Who'll be next?' and other titillations.
The sooner that prostitution (per-lease, what is with this absurd 1950s 'vice girl' crap? The vice is with the user as much as the provider.) is legalised, so that women who pursue it as a career choice can work in the safety of properly-supervised houses, get regular health check-ups, and also pay tax on their earnings, the better.
Young women who patrol the streets by night have always known they were at risk, if only from rough customers and those who beat them up to avoid paying for the service they received. They should be able to work from clean, warm, comfortable surroundings like the prostitutes in Amsterdam or the Phillipines, who are required by their government to undergo regular health checks, including screening for STDs and HIV. That they're still wandering around cold pavements looking for a john is unacceptable in the 21st Century. Like drugs, it's really time to grow up about this.
I'm very sorry for the women's families, especially hit by their deaths just before Christmas. I don't suppose anyone will ever be 'proud' that a relative works at providing sexual services, but I'm sure that they loved them nonetheless. At least the police will have learned a lesson (well, one hopes) - as Warbler alludes - the deaths of a few prostitutes was seen as hardly newsworthy until Peter Sutcliffe began knocking off non-prostitutes. I'm not going to say, as the media did at the time, 'innocent young girls'. They're all innocent - they're just trying to make money their way, and they don't 'deserve' to die for it.