I expect McSwiney to get back to winning ways now he has been beaten at Epsom.
Looked a non stayer at Epsom.
Would expect better from Hurricane Lane at the Curragh. He lost his two front shoes at Epsom and changed his legs a fair bit. 11/2 very fair.
Can't see why they would?The Lads are going to run the race hard aren't they? It's going to setup like the Dante. High Definition doesn't get beat if his supporters are right but in theory HL should finish in front of him.
The Lads are going to run the race hard aren't they? It's going to setup like the Dante. High Definition doesn't get beat if his supporters are right but in theory HL should finish in front of him.
I haven't studied the race yet (not that much to study, to be honest, but I don't think they will set it up for HD. I think they will let them all run their own race and see what happens. They'll probably back whichever they have the strongest information on but history tells us they don't usually set it up for one horse.
I really hope HD is the biz. I haven't looked at the betting yet but presume he's favourite, which, on form, he probably shouldn't be. It might not be a betting race although some sickness insurance on HD just to recoup 2000G losses might be in order.
Would expect better from Hurricane Lane at the Curragh. He lost his two front shoes at Epsom and changed his legs a fair bit. 11/2 very fair.
They do not need another mediocre son of Galileo Irish Derby winner. They need HD to be impressive. The only way to do that is to run this race hard. Their other runners are average at best.
I read an article on the breeding of Derby contenders in the lead-up to Epsom and the writer went into his pedigree in detail, including mention of the Fastnet Rock element but concluded that HD will need at least 12f to be seen to best effect.
You can't both be right![]()