pretty much didn'tcityscape still got 4 legs? horrible drift
I'm resigned to Farrh not being ready so have, in desperation, taken the 10/1 place only about Amaron. Probably well overpriced in the win market at 40/1 so worth a pop.
I was a bit concerned that Farrh tended not to win but he was taking on Frankel and I don’t see many 1s next to Cityscape’s name either. I reckon whichever of these two turns up fittest on the day will win but the 5/1 on offer about Farrh is screaming value.
Farrh likely to be 'rusty', according to Crisford
So much for Value betting David "only value is a winner"
you got some lovely chestnuts you wheel out T
only value is a winner...a beaut
i guess you would be happy taking 6/4 about horses that only win 25% of the time then?..you could say you have lots of winners..which you would have for sure..but no profit
one of my other favourite chestnuts is..time's only important in jail
these statements take me back to smokey bookies in the late 70's when old lads used to trot em out regularly
I'd be delighted to take 6/4 about a winner even if it was the only race he won in a 100 tries mate as there's no horse on the planet who goes off at 6/4 every time he runs.
If I think a horse is truly 6/4 today that doesn't mean he's a 6/4 to me the next.
Anyone can do sums and say what you are saying that does not make an 8/1 shot good value unless he wins 2 races eg from every 8 he runs in but there's absolutely no guarantee he's going to do that.
People who bet like that belong in casinos imo