B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
:lol:
despite its resident troll.
I have to agree, Slim Chance does need looking at more closely from the moderators.
Glad I'm not the first one to pick up on it and his response to EC1 was disgusting.
:lol:
despite its resident troll.
I just wonder are the sectionals worth anything in this race. For example EC1, if the Guineas times were produced pro rata in a run of the mill handicap would you not be sceptical of your findings?
.
I have to agree, Slim Chance does need looking at more closely from the moderators.
Glad I'm not the first one to pick up on it and his response to EC1 was disgusting.
ignore her superiority on the day and just judge her on her performance..which imo is 120...could another filly have run a 121 does anyone thinlk?
i don't see how a horse can fudge sectionals though Slim.
HQ is nearly as good as Attraction on the figures...both ran near identical splits...if she wasn't then after her early exertions she couldn't have run the last 3f in the time she did.
Thats why i love comparing sectionals when they are very similar as in this case.
Attraction ran the first 5f in 59.95..then finished the race in 97.75
HQ first 5f in 60.06..finish in 97.81
that makes Attraction just the better horse...if HQ was a fluke winner then she wouldn't have run a 97.75 after the solid first 5f..she would have wilted.
at end of the day..i'm not saying HQ is any world beater..but she certainly isn't a fluke winner..she ran a decent race which would have taken a 120+ performance to beat..the fact the others have not shown their form isn't her fault
Her next run will be fascinating.
Discourse found to have a fracture of her pelvis after the race.