Never did I think I would see you type that sentence! :lol:
I'm almost tempted to pick up the baton myself as the Mastercraftsman doubter then. I'm still troubled by this horse and what seems to happen to him when he's pitched into a fast pace. My own figures tell me that he struggles.
On the all age par I use for equalising performances off on a level playing field his figures in terms of performance read;
97.26 on +1.82 (5th in the 2000 Gns)
96.39 on +3.83 (4th in the Lagadere)
94.00 on -8.14 (won the Irish 2K)
93.82 on -12.48 (won the Nat Stks)
89.88 on +1.32 (won the Phoenix)
88.32 on +1.48 (won the railway stks)
Now my figures are hardly gospel, but then TS also bring out the same pattern. His fastest two figures of 111, both met with defeat
111 - 5th
111 - 4th
104 - won
100 - won
83 - won
63 - won
Had he been narrowly defeated off a fast pace then you might choose to completely dismiss it, but that's a combined total of 7 horses who've finished ahead of him now. The only time he's met ground which I believe had 'firm' in the description also involved a defeat, though the Guineas might have been close to as fast as Good can be until you might consider using a bit of G/F in places to reflect it.
If I put him on his class par figures which should legislate for age and month of the year, the rank order emerges alters a bit with the Phoenix slightly slower by virtue of being a Gp1 than the Railway which is Gp2 and thus involved a slightly lower bar The Lagadere with a 2yo October allowance is enough to replace his Guineas 5th with a 3yo May allowance. Overall though the figures are much more tightly bunched, which is what we would expect as maturation is hopefully included in this set more accurately
102.61 - Lagadere
101.97 - 2000 Gns
100.29 - Nat Stks
98.70 - Irish Gns
97.64 - Railway Stks
97.52 - Phoenix
Even so, the two fastest were both run in defeat, and both seemingly occured on the two fastest pieces of ground he's encountered.
It points at one level to a horse that struggles if something can throw a challenge down to him at a furious pace, but then at least two of these wins have been registered with a degree of ease to suggest we don't know what figure he might have hit had he really pressed on.
The problem I have, is that my own figures suggest that the horse that's been exposed to the fastest paced races and has the best set of figures run in defeat (as he hasn't won any, though placed in the lot) is a stablemate who probably wouldn't be encouraged to win anyway (provided he lines up)