EC1
On a break
Kingman had weight for age in the Sussex and rightfully so but Toronado by High Chaparral was hardly going to be suited by the way the race was run
not sure about that...they are both milers..neither want 10f..Toronado tried it..fell out of back of telly. So to suggest he is some sort of stamina horse at this stage just because he is by High Chaparral doesn't mean a lot now we seen racecourse performance. Damsire of Toronado is Grand Slam who imparts speed rather than stamina. Kingman Damsire also gets milers but also 14f+ horses..his highest % of winners to runners is at 14f. So its a balancing act..but on the track both are milers.
its back to the argument again about pace...what if Mill Reef- Brigadier Gerard, Nijinsky...also won most of their races in slow run affairs?..Nijinsky's Derby was run slowly..i do know that one. I never heard anyone question his ability because of it...STS's Derby wasn't a true test either..maybe we should discount it from his record as not a fully deserved win if we are going to rub out races on turf that aren't true tests. In fact..we might as well take 60% of G1 win plaudits from all those receiving them as they aren't true tests pace wise. Is Kingman being judged differently to every horse from the past 50 years in an unfair way do you not think?
The fact is..many many G1 races are not true tests..but you still have to win them
Do you think Kingman wasn't that superior to Toronado?..i'm surprised at that as he was at a disadvantage pace wise..by being behind Toronado with a furlong and a half to go..with Toronado having a completely full tank
Last edited: