My own figures for Ascot today suggest the ground was faster than it was at Sandown on Tingle Creek day.
Ascot = -4.08 (soft)
Sandown = -5.93 (heavy)
Indeed, the TS going corrections for the chase course seem to support my findings too, as they're bringing Ascot out as faster than Sandown as well. All of which makes me think that the ground can't be used for anything other than selective expedience in defence of Twist Magic. Nicholls did say that "we got away with it" at Sandown? Possibly true. Today he hasn't. That would be more of a compromise explanation. In other words he was able to beat VPU on slightly slower ground, but he seems to have been very quick to point the finger in defeat, when things haven't gone quite his way.
The simple fact is that the Victor Chandler was run at an appreciably more punishing pace than the Tingle Creek (which was also quick in it's own right). Luckily both cards featured a novice chase run over same C&D so we can use the comparative differentials between the four races to illustrate just how significant this might have been, and how much more punishing the VC was than the TC
Sandown
Twist Magic = -13.57 or -6.78 at an aggragate mile
Marodima = -16.24 or -8.12 at an aggregate mile
Today's race featured an extra furlong, so the aggregate mile might be the better guide, but even so, you can see the difference quite markedly.
Ascot
Tamarinbleu = -8.90 or -4.18 at an aggregate mile
Wee Robbie = -17.10 or -8.04 at an aggregate mile
To make sense of the differentials it becomes necessary to divide the Ascot times into furlongs (the Sandown times are already at 2 miles) and then standardise by multiplying by 16 say (Arkle distance).
Tingle Creek -13.57 versus Victor Chandler -8.37
the Henry VIII -16.24 versus Montpeller -16.09
It's immediately noticable just how similar the two novice times are, as opposed to the open grade 1 chase. More telling however, is the respective gap between them, which provided the gulf in class was similar, and that all were run at true pace, should be similar in both instances (especially as many of the same horses featured).
The Tingle Creek however, was run 2.67 seconds faster than the Henry VIII.
The Chandler was run 7.72 seconds faster than the Montpeller (adjusted to 16F). This equates to a shade over 5 seconds, off what was already a reasonable benchmark. I'm not sure that it would be too easy to suggest that the reason for this lies in a slowly run Montpeller that involved a facile finish either.
It was remarked tounge in cheek that Marodima and Mahogny Blaze were running a Temple Stakes trial elsewhere. Sure they gave the impression of going off hell for leather, and quickly detached themselves from Wee Robbie back in third. It isn't necessarily true though that these two were going off lickety spit. The horses running the Temple stakes trial were in the Victor Chandler.
Now I'm loathed to draw on Nick Mordin and his stopwatch, but you can pretty accurately (though not spot on obviously) time this yourselves using ATR and a conventional stopwatch from the moment the leader hits the landing side of the first fence, to the moment they hit the landing side of the third last.
Tamarinbleu completes this distance in 3.02.75 (according to my ropey attempts) the visually faster (virtue of opening the bigger gap and duelling with each other) Mahogny Blaze completes this in 3.06.41, a full 3.66 seconds slower. If you think that the Novices were running a suicidal pace, the leaders in the Chandler were going much faster, and it's perhaps notable how many of them had dropped away by Swinley Bottom.
It is at this juncture in the race however that Tamarinbleu comes into his own and Twist Magic isn't able to continue the uneven fight, although it probably takes Wee Robbie to illustrate it.
Now having conserved his energy, and been 30L's off the leading novice chasers, there might be grounds for thinking that he would now complete the distance from the third last to the finishing post the fastest? (especially as he was involved in a 3 way fight for the line, where as at least Tamarinbleu had burned off his pursuers)
Now from the moment that both horses hit the landing side of the third last to the post, I reckon they ran it in something like;
Tamarinbleu = 1.00.75
Wee Robbie = 1.02.56
Again Tamarinbleu has gone faster by about 1.81 seconds having already been faster by 3.66 to the leading novice up to the third last. Even if the fastest novice had run relays legs, they couldn't have beaten Tamarinbleu. It is the Pipe's horse combination therefore of stamina sustaining his sectional speed that has settled the issue, and Twist Magic has had no answer. When he's been asked to do the same he's eventually folded.
It is often a feature of 2 mile champions that they have the stamina to win grade 1 races at 2 and a half, as when called on to run a fast time in a fiercely competitive race it is this stamina that comes into play, and enable them to be what is in effect 'the last horse to stop slowing up'. MWDS won a fast time Arkle thus, having proved himself over further. 5 of the last 10 Champion Hurdle wins came out of the Sun Alliance (though I'm sure someone will point out a bit double and treble counting there
). Moscow Flyer proved his ability at Aintree, Well Chief couldn't. Proper grade 1 Two mile Championship races often require more stamina to win them than is often imagined, as people wrongly think they're the preserve of speedsters. The Supreme Novices seems to be the finishing school for classy staying chasers (War of Attrition, Kicking King, Best Mate) then novice hurdles at longer trips for instance.
I digress. :shy:
The Champion Chase first run in 1959 has only witnessed two 6yo winners. Inkslinger in 1973 and VPU. What has today done for Twist Magic's chances of joining the list? In truth I don't know. I think he's probably a horse that at this stage of his career is right on the margin of being able to get a fiercely run 2 miles. Today of course he had to encounter an extra furlong and ground that wouldn't have helped, and I wouldn't under estimate that. At Cheltenham these won't and wouldn't normally occur, however the hill is a graveyard for questionable stayers and it's more punishing than Ascot's. There's also the issue of tired jumps, which at Cheltenham will finish his chances, (as it did in last years Arkle) which was also subject of a furious pace, and very fast time. I'd attribute his loss today to pace, trip, and ground, which with two of these not likely to be in play come March, still gives him every chance, especially of a compassionate pace. On balance though I'd say that at this stage everything's pointing to a successful title defence (it's not as if the honours board isn't littered with them).