• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

The 2022 Grand National

The same.

It's got nothing to do with O'Leary.

45 years ago they let Red Rum in with a lower weight and he hacked up. The horse has shown twice how well he acts round here and that has to be taken into account. In recent years horses that have run well in the National without winning have been on higher marks than in other races because of their form in the race. It's normal.

Even Elliott seemed to be licking his lips in anticipation when discussing TR's prospects earlier today. He gave the impression he felt the horse had been let in lightly.

Look too at last year's winner Minella Times. He went up to 159 for winning, has bombed twice since and was eased to 158 but was given 161 for this because of his course form. It's commonplace in the race.

But it works both ways. A couple of years back old Highland-whatever was allowed into the race off 148 instead of his OR of 142 or so because of his better form over the big fences.

Can you imagine how ballistic O'Leary would have gone if the handicapper had put Tiger Roll into the race on 140, claiming the horse was so badly out of form he thought he was gone at the game, leaving him with no chance of making the cut?

O'Leary is a self-serving arsehole and I would love it if the handicapper really was out to stick it right up him. He deserves it. But I honestly don't think it's the case. It would make the handicapper look petty and I don't think he can afford to put himself in that kind of situation.
 
Another possibly important consideration for the race itself:

Nine of the first ten home last year were trained in Ireland, as were 12 of the 15 finishers. The first British horse home was Blaklion back in sixth.
 
Another possibly important consideration for the race itself:

Nine of the first ten home last year were trained in Ireland, as were 12 of the 15 finishers. The first British horse home was Blaklion back in sixth.

You mean there are English horses in this year's race...
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the idea that there is an Aintree factor come from when the race was fundamentally different?

Might as well give adjusted marks for horses that prefer strong pace/big fields or sloppy jumpers.

Minella Times might be primed to run his best race this year at Aintree, but I dont think it will be because its the Grand National that he does so.
 
Doesn't the idea that there is an Aintree factor come from when the race was fundamentally different?

Might as well give adjusted marks for horses that prefer strong pace/big fields or sloppy jumpers.

Minella Times might be primed to run his best race this year at Aintree, but I dont think it will be because its the Grand National that he does so.

There is something to this. I think that National is now a glorified Cross Country chase rather than this spectacular test Michael O'Leary would have us believe.
 
Doesn't the idea that there is an Aintree factor come from when the race was fundamentally different?

Might as well give adjusted marks for horses that prefer strong pace/big fields or sloppy jumpers.

Minella Times might be primed to run his best race this year at Aintree, but I dont think it will be because its the Grand National that he does so.

Absolutely, used to be able to rule out most of the field since they wouldn’t survive the fences. Alex Bird (for those with long memories) made a handsome killing every year. Not the case now, but still retains its charisma.
 
I think the National remains a unique test.

Even the other races through the season over the National fences produce form you often don't get at other tracks.

I suppose you could argue that Cheltenham form tends to work out best at Cheltenham too.

It's probably too complicated a task to have different ratings for different courses (and/or distances) and it boils down to trainers to send their horses to courses according to their purposes (to win or get the mark down or just to experiment) but the National itself is once a year with a huge prize and deserves discrete consideration.
 

Assuming Timeform still adjust their ratings to 12-7, this means they have Any Second Now on 164 compared with his OR of 159.

That strikes me as very conservative.

I don't keep track of Timeform ratings other than an occasional look at the lists in their 'Fifty' books.

On the up side, seeing Commodore in there suggests they probably think he has a good shout on Saturday!
 

Recent Blog Posts

Back
Top