He had the race won at every stage, and wasn't asked a question until disposing of Captain Conan in half-a-dozen strides after the 2nd last.
Sandown is a much stiffer 2 miles than Cheltenham.
Captain Conan wasn't asked a question until that point either and if he'd won could have been said to have had the race won at every stage. Sire De Grugy was entitled to win if CC didn't show the requisite improvement from his novice season.
Surely the chase course at Sandown is stiffer than the hurdles course there.
Aye, just make your own story up as you go along.
Captain Conan was done for speed by a much sharper horse. I've little doubt he'll show "the requisite improvement" when given more of a stamina test.
Surely the chase course at Sandown is stiffer than the hurdles course there.
Aye, just make your own story up as you go along.
I backed SDG. I wouldn't have been confident of calling it the winner until going to the second last.
So stick your fcuking rolleyes up your fcuking asre.
Would that be the same second last where "he won the race by gaining momentum away from it"?
What is it with all this conjecture?
Captain Conan didn't win, didn't have a burst of speed, and never looked - at any stage of the race - to have the measure of SDG,
Would that be the same second last where "he won the race by gaining momentum away from it"?
.I thought he won it when he checked SDG's stride approaching the second last and then rode it confidently for a good jump. That allowed the horse to meet the fence bang on and gain momentum away from it