TV coverage

I didn't know that re Warren, the council estate bit? That makes him even worse. I had 2 interviews with him, his wife was there for second one and she was as bad. Got to the office and he wasn't there. One of the other girls rang him and he said on the phone it was the wrong day, she was politely trying to tell him it was the right day, I could hear him shouting down the phone at her. She was going redder and redder in the face and looked on edge of tears. I'm mouthing to her 'sorry I'll go', no no she say. He turns up , storms through door and continues to berate her in front of me. I should have walked then really but stuck it out for the morning. One 'job' I had to do was type up the mating plans, he has no clue. Absolutely none.
That job is regularly advertised. Dear Diamond Geezer saw it advertised about a year after I had gone for it and sent me the link 'cos he knew I was trying to get back into a racing/stud job.

Yes me too re EJH- can't stand her. I read about that case, has it not been settled as I read about it a while ago? Involved a pregnant girl if I remember correctly?

Makes me feel better about my opinions of both! Warren is just loathsome. That behaviour just confirms it. It is inexcusable to berate staff in front of someone like that. If you need to speak to someone, then you do it privately and in a calm manner.

Dear old DG...I too used to get sent jobs regularly. He was such a kind man and I miss him hugely.

I was talking to a friend tonight who works locally for a trainer and she too was hearing horror stories about EJH. I obviously have plenty but it’s quite nice to have my opinion backed up. She thought the court case was current and on going and fairly large? (she is a local racing secretary and would have good contacts) but yes it is to do with a pregnant girl. Years ago she (EJH) was plastered across the News of the World for breaking up another trainers marriage in Lambourn...think she wasn’t much more than 16 at the time...FJH was furious.
 
Wow! That’s pretty jaw dropping to read although do slightly need a translator at some point! Can’t see a proper verdict or outcome? Although that might be me?

And yes this is EXACTLY how she behaves...and her mother. When I was there kept getting massive electricity bills and it wasn’t until the electricity board came over when there was an issue that the engineer mentioned that I was paying for their staff accommodation electricity too.....which they were charging each member of staff £17/week! And I was effing well footing the bill!

And then of course after I left they took me to court refusing to accept the rent cheque as they said I had damaged the property (I hadn’t) and served court papers to a property in Newmarket (I’d moved there) that I had never ever even been to knowing full well that I wouldn’t be able to contest it. And lo and behold the bailiffs turned up some time later. I actually got the court case reopened, represented myself and won with the judge actually being very critical of their solicitor saying their behaviour was unacceptable. There was even an email stating that “my client has the intention to bankrupt her former tenant!”
 
It reads ( to me) as if they’ve got the final bit to go, but it’s all found in favour of the girl ?

What a horrible situation for her to find herself in - though we both know how it works, it’s all good while you’re toeing the line….


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
All the detail is absolutely accurate as I witnessed plenty that went on. I was under the impression that it wasn’t over yet. I hope the poor girl is ok...and good on her for taking them on because very few would have done. Hopefully they’ll hammer them hard over it...I’d start right at the beginning....no written contract! I remember Fudge who was on here briefly telling me (he’s now an integral part of the NASS and used to work for FJH so knew her well) that they had a huge file on her of staff complaints and she was one of the worst.
 
Yes - you don’t get far in before the alarm bells start ringing do you!!

I just hope the lady is doing ok now and her and her daughter are happy. And I hope EJH gets her comeuppance at last.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Wow first, no wonder things like this take so long? Nor sure referencing a case in Pakistan is actually relevant realy but.. this just gives her the right to take to an Employment Tribunal .
I did start to think what does it matter what kind of background she had and who's business is that but it seems this was played on hoping she would walk quietly. Good for her for standing up for herself.
Round two to come.

Wondering if SS still there as I read this as not backing her boss up too much and how that has gone down?

And £68 a month each for electric? Seriously???

Aside from anything else, Richi cornered her in the paddock last week and the demeanour of her to him was quite frankly obnoxious. Anyone watching that looking for a trainer wouldn't touch with a barge pole.
 
Last edited:
Yeah the electric was something else! As was the accommodation which was basically a big wooden chalet in a U shape but they were just rooms with a communal kitchen, bathroom and loos. So it meant you had to leave your room in the middle of the night to cross the quadrant to use the loo...in all weathers! It may have changed by now as I left in 2007. But it was pretty ropey! My wooden chalet that I rented wasn’t much better and so damp that my clothes used to go black! And we had a horrendous rat infestation just before I left...my ex shot 350 of them after even my cat who was an excellent ratter said enough is enough! When we moved, all the rats moved across to the staff accommodation and the JHs refused to do anything about it until one lad kicked off.

Wonder what the timescale is for a verdict or whatever?
 
This gives her the right to take to Employment Tribunal, EJH was trying to block that but has been ruled against. Can't see date in there. Probably another 6 months plus at least if took them nearly 18 months to get this far.

SS still there according to the website.
Is Mia Nicholls one of Paul's or Adrian's or neither?
 
Last edited:
Was telling a friend about the EJH hearing and he said a friend of his is currently writing a book about women in racing and she was the most unhelpful by far and pretty pointless speaking to her. Jessie Harrington on the other hand, couldn't have been more helpful. Not a huge surprise there really.
 
And yet her grandmother was a pioneer for women in racing! You’d think she’d be flattered to be asked! But no it doesn’t surprise me as she’s deeply unpleasant.
 
Also from Sandown, Cesca definitely pregnant: Ollie overheard telling someone she'll miss all of next year's flat as taking a year off. I went to buy some flags .
 
Irish racing was on Wednesday facing an existential crisis as Racing TV and Sky Sports Racing threatened to pull their coverage if a swingeing ban on advertising as proposed in the new Gambling Regulation Bill was brought into effect.

Racing Media Group (RMG), the parent company of Racing TV which has secured exclusive media rights to broadcast from all 26 Irish tracks until 2029, said that its service will likely "cease to be viable in Ireland" should the bill, which passed committee stage on Tuesday evening, be enacted in its current form. Sky Sports Racing, whose widespread coverage of British racing is available to watch in Ireland, warned its Irish broadcast operations would be "economically unviable".

The long-awaited bill proposes a new watershed whereby gambling advertising is banned between 5.30am and 9pm, in effect denying any adverts on live horseracing coverage during daytime hours.

Martin Stevenson, RMG's chief executive officer, told the Racing Post: "There would be substantial economic and operational challenges in ceasing to carry gambling advertising, sponsorships, and branding on Racing TV – and it is likely to mean that it ceases to be viable to continue broadcasting in Ireland."

Stevenson added: “We are very supportive that gambling legislation in Ireland is modernised to protect the vulnerable, but there is a significant risk that the unintentional result is that racing fans and the industry are no longer able to watch the racing channels in Ireland.
"It would be a huge shame to potentially deny Irish breeders, owners, trainers, and jockeys as well as the huge number of Irish racing fans and enthusiasts the ability to watch the major racing festivals and day-to-day coverage of horseracing from Ireland and Great Britain."

David Jennings' comment: Banning betting ads on racing channels would be a futile experiment that could savage the sport
Racing TV recently secured the rights to broadcast from all Irish racecourses until 2029 at the earliest, after five of them initially rejected a €47 million-a-year deal only to sign up at the 11th hour. An even bigger obstacle now has to be cleared.

Stevenson added: “Television coverage is the lifeblood for any sport and the damage that the loss of these channels in Ireland might cause the successful Irish racing industry is of real concern. Once fans are no longer able to watch a sport on TV, there is a real risk that the sport then suffers a decline in interest and participation.

“Racing TV is a subscription channel and therefore satisfies, in our view, many of the ‘opt in’ safeguards seen elsewhere in the Bill. We ask the new gambling regulator and the Oireachtas to recognise the very close relationship between racing and betting and allow an exemption for dedicated channels showing horseracing. This would permit betting companies’ advertising, sponsorships and branding to be shown on those channels’ coverage of horseracing, during the watershed hours of 5.30am to 9pm.

“We want racing fans to be able to watch all of Irish and British racing live, and to be able to engage and interact with the sport that has played, and continues to play, such an important role in Ireland. We would very much welcome an opportunity to further discuss and consult on an exemption, which is compliant and practical, while protecting young and vulnerable viewers from harm.”
It is unclear whether the ban will encompass references to odds and market movers, or even if bookmakers will be permitted to sponsor races. However, it has been suggested that overseas broadcasters would have to adhere to the law, which would mean feeds from Sky Sports Racing or Racing TV would not be permitted to broadcast the same advertisements to their audiences in Ireland as they would in the UK.

Matthew Imi, chief executive of Sky Sports Racing, said: "We welcome the new Gambling Regulation Bill as we are strong supporters of responsible gambling – a message which runs consistently across all of our media platforms – and agree with the central premise on the need to protect problem gamblers and children.
"However, we are extremely concerned about a provision in the Gambling Regulation Bill which proposes a ban on all gambling advertising and sponsorship on TV, radio and online from 5.30am until 9pm every day. Uniquely, as compared to other sports, horseracing and betting go hand in hand, so a significant amount of advertising on our specialist horseracing channel and, indeed, on competitor racing channels, is betting related.
"If this proposed watershed ban on gambling advertising goes ahead as drafted it could have a devastating impact on such dedicated horseracing channels. It’s our view that such a ban may render Sky Sports Racing economically unviable in Ireland if the option for bookmaker advertising and sponsorship support is no longer open to us.
"Not only would this penalise the multitude of horseracing fans in Ireland, but it would also have a negative impact on the industry as a whole, which we know is worth €2.4 billion to the Irish economy and which supports more than 30,000 jobs.
"The profile of Irish racing has never been higher with Irish horses, jockeys, trainers and owners competing with great success in racing, not just in the UK but all over the world. Racing fans in Ireland – watching both from home and from pubs and clubs – would be deprived of watching their local champions if we, reluctantly, have to make a decision to remove Sky Sports Racing from Ireland."

The bill passed the committee stage on Tuesday evening and will now go into the report stage, where amendments proposed on Tuesday will be considered. It will then progress to the final stage in Dail Eireann before going through a similar process in the Seanad, after which it will be enacted into law by the president.
 
Imo, once the Irish Parliament appreciate that they'll be screwing part of their own income stream, they might have second thoughts?:)
 
1. Why is all that contrived 'party' shite shoe horned into racing coverage these days?
2. When listing the field, why does Richard H say 'take out number eight' when 'Desert Orchid is a non runner' would (a) be just as easy and (b) more informative?
 
And the constant fawning over one particular trainer....EC “ oh how I love interviewing her.....” Every. single. Time.
 
1. Why is all that contrived 'party' shite shoe horned into racing coverage these days?

To make groups of gullible clowns want to come racing and spend their money within the sport rather than within the wider hospitality industry.

2. When listing the field, why does Richard H say 'take out number eight' when 'Desert Orchid is a non runner' would (a) be just as easy and (b) more informative?

Definitely. I often just have the racing on in the background while studying the 48hr decs during a meeting. If one I've backed for that day's racing is a non-runner I won't know until I go and watch the race because I won't know its number. It's as if it's policy not to say the horse's name. They all do it.

I can understand it if there are several non-runners they're listing on the morning programme but leading up to the race? Nah.
 
Back
Top