Originally posted by EC1@May 4 2008, 01:52 PM
It's quite funny how none of the "experts" on channel 4 have mentioned the odd results they are getting seeing as how they think the ground is fast.
Before Getaway won..they re-ran the Arc and said...ooo this horse will be meeting such different conditions today..it will struggle.
No one yet thinks to question the official going just might be wrong...hence Good/easy ground horse like Getaway revelled in it.
Unfortunately the RP are gettign very slow at putting results up (can they really expect to charge for this?) but that's another point.
I made yesterdays ground -0.67 (slower side of Good, but still Good nonetheless)
I made todays ground +0.22 (quicker side of good, but still Good nonetheless)
Natagora was 0.15 secs faster than HenrytheNav over 8F
Saphiras Fire was 0.31 faster than Dr Faustus over 10F
(3yo 0-100 versus 3yo listed for fillies)
The other races run over same C&D between the two days can't really be compared as Heaven Sents victory yesterday, and Getaways today were on the slower side of being truly run. Or to put it another, a Gp2 winner wouldn't expect to be 1.25 secs slower than a 0-100 winner, who seemed hell bent on running sideways and barging the opposition out of the way.
I'd say the ground was Good and be pretty confident. The two races over C&D involving evenly matched types point to this, and there isn't that much evidence of the ground speeding up significantly, and certainly not enough to justify the moving of a going description. I'm not entirely sure I can agree with Dave Edwards though whose called it G/S