S
SlimChance
Guest
Question for Kolondra backers. Would it surprise you that it only traded at a low of 7.2 in running at Galway?
Question for Kolondra backers. Would it surprise you that it only traded at a low of 7.2 in running at Galway?
I'm not familiar with in-running markets but Sub Lt would, I imagine, have been odds-on at the point at which K fell.
Fair comment. The market has really tightened up on it. Mad that Pricewise still moves the market despite a pathetic strike rate.
I reckon it's the bookies suckering punters into believing a gamble is developing. They get the word at 5pm (as the paper goes to press) on what he's putting up. They cut it and punters want to get on before it shortens any further, thus causing, if not a snowball effect exactly, a further contraction for a while.
The really annoying thing is when the likes of us coincide with PW's selection. We end up not getting the better odds more via bookie manipulation rather than genuine market strength.
Still, we're all on Kalondra at 11/1 and better, aren't we :lol:
Hold fire on any Benatar bets until you've seen the declarations later, waiting for test results this morning on a lung problem apparently.
Benatar a non runner !
Did Benatar not shorten dramatically yesterday? Last I looked was 13/2...More suspect practices from the rotten bookmaking industry???
I reckon it's the bookies suckering punters into believing a gamble is developing. They get the word at 5pm (as the paper goes to press) on what he's putting up. They cut it and punters want to get on before it shortens any further, thus causing, if not a snowball effect exactly, a further contraction for a while.
The really annoying thing is when the likes of us coincide with PW's selection. We end up not getting the better odds more via bookie manipulation rather than genuine market strength.
Still, we're all on Kalondra at 11/1 and better, aren't we :lol:
Maybe not 'dramatically' but it did go blue across the board. I mentioned it on here just after DG posted his warning about its health.
I'm not convinced it's down to suspect practices, though. Few people distrust bookies more than I do but usually when there's a doubt the odds, especially at Betfair, tend to lengthen. The practice of shortening up prices tends to take place where, say, something gets loose or appears lame at the start and is being checked by the vet. I don't think R4 would have been in play at the time DG's message came through yesterday and it wouldn't affect ante-post bets.
There will have been a lot of bets affected by the rule 4. It's more annoying than anything cynical.
Decs were midday on Thursday. All bets after that are subject to a rule 4.
Are you sure about that, Slim?
I'm pretty sure I was told (when I made a similar enquiry a couple of years ago) that it's ante-post rules until something like 4pm the day before, even with 48h decs.
The 1:50 was a great race to watch. My fancy Royal Vacation has run a huge race, which probably would have been enough to win 9/10 renewals of the same race. Coneygree back in third, with a back-to-form winner in the shape of Rock The Kasbah.