Best book to recommend on 'Enery, then? I've enjoyed the many programmes on him, but feel I'd like something more substantial to pootle in and out of over a period of time - a good book which reads interestingly but is also properly factual. Would appreciate a steer.
Meanwhile, gleaned from this week's copy of The Week's book reviews, for your consideration, starting with a novel:
THE MISSING by Tim Gautreaux, Sceptre, 384pp, £17.99
Tells the story of Sam Simoneaux, who, returning to New Orleans from the First World War, tries to settle down with a wife and a job as a security guard. But when a little girl is abducted on his watch at a store, he feels bound to help find her... he embarks on a dangerous quest up the Mississippi River and into its lawless hinterland. Life aboard is vividly recreated with its jazz, dancing, and nightly fights. Very good reviews from The Sunday Times, The Indie, and the Grauniad: gripping, sharp dialogue, a weighty meditation on law and lawlessness, guilt and the hollowness of vengeance.
Two nonfictions:
ON ROADS: A HIDDEN HISTORY by Joe Moran, Profile, 312pp, £14.99
Moran is a cultural historian and this is his book about the history of British roads. It's 'terrific' says Robert Macfarlane of The Guardian - numerous diversions into subjects which shouldn't be that interesting, but which Moran makes fascinating: the development of the road atlas, or the history of the roadside verge. Full of strange details: seagulls often cluster in Birmingham because they mistake the M5 for a river; pulped books are used in tarmac - the M6 contains millions of Mills & Boon novels, etc. etc.
REFLECTIONS ON THE REVOLUTION IN EUROPE by Christopher Caldwell, Allen Lane, 376pp, £14.99
Caldwell is a right-wing American who paints a depressingly familiar picture of fast-breeding immigrants driving out the natives of Europe - he thinks that Enoch Powell was more right than wrong. Mark Mazower of the Financial Times claims the book's not the best guide to the migration debate since it's too unhinged, too doggedly provocative, to be that. However, other reviewers think Caldwell's right in his analysis of immigration as an inherently unstable and dysfunctional system, encouraged by elites who took a ludicrously short-sighted view of its costs and consequences. Either way, or any way, you look at it, the book addresses an issue which is so immersed "in fear and wishful thinking" that it's hard to discuss clearly at all.