That's more like it.
I tend not to debate EC1's stuff because I don't fully understand it, but want to. I will ask him the occasional question about it. I will even query his conclusions, eg that sprinter he highlighted back in the spring from a race at Newcastle. I was quick to cast doubt on the prospect of it being a G1 sprinter (which was a part-misunderstanding on my part).
I am concerned, though, that people like you come on here and insult him and his work to the extent that he might consider leaving here, which would be a far bigger loss than some I could think of.
I offer plenty of opinions on here. But the more they are criticised for the sake of the criticism rather than having any basis in fact, the less likely I am to post.
This isn't a playground corner. This is probably one of the best forums to be found anywhere but it isn't as good as it once was because certain people moved away because they were abused. Why spoil the place with unwarranted personal attacks?
If you have a point to debate, why not just debate it?