Que?Originally posted by prince regent@Oct 30 2007, 12:16 PM
do you by any chance have stats on which jockeys lose the most grp 1 races that they should have won on
Que?Originally posted by prince regent@Oct 30 2007, 12:16 PM
do you by any chance have stats on which jockeys lose the most grp 1 races that they should have won on
Originally posted by chrisbeekracing@Oct 31 2007, 07:02 PM
I'm keen to lay the Curley hoss in the last as well.
Mind you I'm more keen on lumping on John Gosden's in the 2nd at Lingfield tomorrow.
Why would that be a disadvantage if the aim was just to ride the most winners? Prescott will often have only one or two runners at the lesser meetings throughout the summer leaving Sanders often the pick of the runners in the other races while Spencer would be plying his trade at the big meetings in very competitive races at the likes of Royal Ascot and Epsom.Originally posted by Headstrong@Oct 29 2007, 01:21 AM
Sanders is retained stable jockey to Sir Mark Prescott. Therefore he has to go to whichever meeting Sir Mark has runners at; and he has to ride everything in the stable, regardless of its ability, state of readiness etc etc. It's hardly a level playing field, is it.
Why would that be a disadvantage if the aim was just to ride the most winners? Prescott will often have only one or two runners at the lesser meetings throughout the summer leaving Sanders often the pick of the runners in the other races while Spencer would be plying his trade at the big meetings in very competitive races at the likes of Royal Ascot and Epsom. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Dante+Nov 1 2007, 09:40 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dante @ Nov 1 2007, 09:40 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Headstrong@Oct 29 2007, 01:21 AM
Sanders is retained stable jockey to Sir Mark Prescott. Therefore he has to go to whichever meeting Sir Mark has runners at; and he has to ride everything in the stable, regardless of its ability, state of readiness etc etc. It's hardly a level playing field, is it.