So what if you hate them, Galileo? I like them - neither statement is particularly useful unless it's propped up by some reasoning. Which I've done. I don't know what you mean by 'racing on the track is not point to point, cross country, eventing... ' because all of those events require the horses to race on a set course, against the clock. Showjumping is timed, especially in the jump-offs, so speed and accuracy matter.
"Jumps racing" was, once upon a time and long ago, based upon the natural obstacles which hunters (from which, duh, 'National Hunt') faced in the hunting field. Fortunately, the French, who still hunt and have no such wussy qualms about what their horses handle, treat their jumps racing on the basis that it still represents the sport's heritage. We've lost that, just as we've lost many other aspects of racing, like tic-tac men. The obstacles in France are, of course, nothing as tough as what real hunters in the field would face - no five-bar gates, for example, and the stone wall's got a nice foam topping, but it's still a stone wall underneath. Their horses seem to thrive on the variety and, as you've no doubt noticed on their appearance in the UK either as guest runners or permanent imports, they have no trouble with our poxy 'regulations' (uprights) and open ditches.
We'll probably just have to agree to disagree, Gal, but just because you hate water jumps doesn't mean they're not a good idea - and a lot more variety in the obstacles would help keep horses (and jockeys) a lot sharper.
I can see the day coming where someone decides that no courses should have dips or rises, that Fontwell Park's figure 8 is way too tricky, and that uprights don't invite safe take-off lines, and should therefore be banned. At that point, please hand me the double-dose of Rohypnol, so I can slip peacefully away.