Are people actually doing that??
I've seen blogs on it...
Are people actually doing that??
I reckon they won’t allow Tiger Roll to win. It would stick in too many craws if there was an implication he’s a better horse than Red Rum.
I also doubt they’ll let a big outsider win because there’d be cries of ‘fix’.
I reckon they won’t allow Tiger Roll to win. It would stick in too many craws if there was an implication he’s a better horse than Red Rum.
I also doubt they’ll let a big outsider win because there’d be cries of ‘fix’.
Rumours that one of the favourites has pulled a pixel.
I find it a bit hard to believe that this ‘event’ is no different to the 4.54 at Paddy Park. This is a purely mechanical exercise, with no input from the ITV pundits and production team?
I always understood it was based on form, commercial ratings, course form, jumping record, stamina record etc etc with some randomness chucked in to produce the odd surprise, like maybe Tiger Roll falling.
Surely if it's entirely mechanical Ballyoptic wins as he's officially 6lbs well in. The official handicapper has effectively had his say.
Put this is imputed into the odds. The rest is pure random number generated. It is essentially a 4.54 from Paddy Park.
All subject to the GIGO principle, though.
You didn't win then :lol:
What a load of utter crap! Horses simply don’t run up and down with the pace like that. TR would not have had as much use made of him as that under that weight.
Clearly not! Actually my mother got a bit upset when Bristol de Mai fell until I reminded her that it wasn’t real yet I got pissed off with the result! :lol: