It's a thread which we seem to have annually And yes I agree with your point about 'jocks for horses'Originally posted by clivex@Feb 3 2008, 08:21 PM
Mcevoy would never be a negative for me, but i still think this is an odd thread
stick by original comments that its an overrated factor but if taking it seriously surely jockeys have strengths and weaknesses which suit or dont suit particulr horses/courses/races?
He did ride a different race at Kempton...thats the reason he lost!Originally posted by useful@Feb 4 2008, 01:23 PM
Carberry's arrogance stops him even trying to ride a different type of race on the horse just in case it might work!
but a jock can sure as hell *lose* a race on a horse which should have won. You see it every day - even the top jocks can manage that.
The jocks in whom we have the most confidence are ones we see making fewest mistakes, surely? - ie those who can both judge pace and are tactically astute; followed by those who are strong in a finish.
Harchibald couldnt challenge for a handicap at Cheltenham when they rode him positively. He got beat by Brave Inca at Punchestown when he went too early. He does not do anything when he hits the front. One sharp short burst and he comes to the end of his tether. So your incorrect to say they should try something different...they have and it failed. His better results have come since they have started to hold him up.Originally posted by useful@Feb 4 2008, 04:31 PM
Yes, perhaps, but having been beaten in this matter so often in Grade 1 Hurdles, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to work out that maybe the time has come for a tactical change?
Oh, and as for Noel Meade knowing the relative worth/ability of his animals, didn't look like that with the uncontrollable hype he displayed re: Sweet Wake and Aran Concerto.
Aran Concerto disappointed once in England and he is proclaimed a failure. Why ignore his form in Ireland
Classic Clivex. Classic.Originally posted by clivex@Feb 4 2008, 03:53 PM
Aran Concerto disappointed once in England and he is proclaimed a failure. Why ignore his form in Ireland
Because he failed in the race he was aimed at. What was so great about his irish form anyway? I havent rechecked it but at the time, i recall that it wasnt all that exciting
I have begun to use the P Carberry Harchibald as the acid test for punters. Anyone who thinks that a) Carberry was at fault for the Champion loss b) that McCoy or a tougher rider in the finish would have got him up to me is someone who is trying to learn the game, but doesnt really understand it and still has a way to go.
Clivex. I suggest you do your own research
I cannot see how you can argue Harchibald has been given a fair chance of proving himself able to win a race before the final flight at Grade 1 level.
It had nothing to do with AC form. What I found a classic Clivex moment was the rush to judgement regardless of form/evidence. If you want to knock the horse, give us some evidence, and not some half-baked notion, that you couldnt spare 2 minutes on the racing post site to check out.