Michael Jackson?

Originally posted by jejquade+Mar 9 2005, 10:41 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jejquade @ Mar 9 2005, 10:41 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Shadow Leader@Mar 8 2005, 11:59 PM
Sorry Aunty K - you're right, it's only people after all!!! Silly me.....I must remember that it's also ok to be accused of abusing young boys too as long as you pay the families enough money to cover it up.....
Innocent til proven guilty is obviously not a concept you understand then? [/b][/quote]
Read again what I put.....I said accused.

It doesn't take any intelligence to hunt a fox down and rip it to pieces. Fox Hunters do have something in common with serial killes though they are both sick in the head.

Will you desist in bandying about these grossly offensive and abusive comments please? It takes intelligence to make a reasoned argument rather than come out with comments such as that one. Also, whoever said it takes intelligence to go foxhunting? I certainly didn't.

I said the books and papers i read are entertaining.

Do you want me to remind you of what you actually wrote? You put :

Some murders are entertaining in a morbid kind of way.

Not quite the same thing, I think you'll agree. I would strongly advise you to think of better word usage before you post anything in future.
 
Originally posted by jejquade@Mar 10 2005, 12:41 AM
Some people on here really have chips on their shoulders.
Chips on shoulders? You don't think that maybe it's more a case of people's backs being put up by constant barbed or offensive comments & statements??
 
Ok, what was entertaining about Ted Bundy raping and killing 12yo Kimberly Leach?
 
Originally posted by jejquade@Mar 10 2005, 12:45 AM
Thanks for the advice Shadowleader but i'll post what i like
I'll suggest you read the rules of the board, love. It states in there that you are not to post abusive or offensive comments. If you don't like that then I suggest you go elsewhere.
 
Why are you getting defensive? You asked me to list one of their murders, so I did.

You said you found some of their murders entertaining. I don't, but was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and let you possibly educate me on why someone might find murder entertaining.
 
Isn't it a depressing fact of life that the sales of ghastly collect month by month magazines like Murder Casebook shows that too many people find murder " fascinating or entertaining "

It isn't. It is brutish ,vile and destructive of not merely the life of the individual but often the life of others .
 
jejquade - You would soon change your mind if you were being chased down the street by hammer-wielding blood-stained Bundy.
 
Looking at a car crash isn't the test of being morbid.

Using that logic, gynaecologists are perverts.
 
Anyway, getting back to Michael Jackson.

His defence lawyer has gone in with all guns blazing on the witnesses, exposing them as liars at various times.

Exactly as Brian said he would, and quite understandable.

Personally, I don't care if he is guilty or not. My hope is that if the prosecution do not prove his guilt beyond all reasonable doubt, he is acquitted. That's the legal system and mob mentality should NEVER be given a voice.
 
The evidence the Prosecution put forward regarding the porn mag was totally false, it was dated 5 months after the family had left. Are the Prosecution not trying, coz i can't believe they would make a mistake that bad without meaning to.
 
Okay, Joanna - you state that profilers 'help police catch killers sooner'... 'most of the time'. Where did you find that evidence? Profiling is a relatively recent, and narrowly practised, adjunct to good old detective and forensics work. Can you tell me which British killers have been usefully caught 'sooner'? Sooner than what? Killing only five people? Too bad if you're number five - I guess you fall into the 'most of the time' shortfall. The Colin Stagg case would seem to be a spectacularly fine example of profiling gone wrong, wouldn't you agree?
 
We have two prominent British profilers who are trotted out on telly to sound important and rather smug from time to time. One is called Ray Wise. I'd have thought you'd know about them and their work, and perhaps have some insight into why they're generally so crap at it? But apparently not, so no problem.
 
Continue amongst yourselves as KRIZON, has just informed me being new means i just have to read and not post so i'll leave you all to it seeing as you are so wise. I bow down to your amazing insights.
 
Back
Top