Unless it's made public it will have absolutely no impact. The thought that one bet can change a market is nonsense..
Something to consider.
do any of this lot strike you as a champion horse next season or are they all embryonic chasers?
Guess you know better than me if it was on TV must be true
And learn to read I said it was JP's bet of the week (He told Tom Segal when he asked him) where did I say AP said it was his best chance of a winner?
@nd time in a week you've pulled me up and been wrong
Neptune Novices Hurdle
Putting on a lowly €20 on Outlander with PaddyPower, I get this notice on my betslip:- "Maximum stake for Outlander to win is 0.87".
Go and do one, Paddy ! This is Cheltenham, ffs.
(No point to this post, I guess, but it makes feel a little better ..................)
True, I think you're spot-on, lad.Why bother with the bastids mate.
True, I think you're spot-on, lad.
I'm done with them (PaddyPower) now -- this account is useless and may as well be closed out.
The stomach-churning thing is, tho', listening to the Powers rep spouting on Ch4 how they have taken multiple bets of ten monkeys each on such-and-such a horse. Yeah, and then Lay me a max of 0.87 cents at the biggest meeting of the year.
No, just pointing out that AP is saying one thing to one person (TV, that Jezki, owned by JP, was his best chance of a winner) and something different to another (your source, that it was "JP's best bet of the week").
I think most people would conclude that best bet means best chance of a winner. I wouldn't, but most of the general public would.