The other thing of course about this race typically being run quickly, is that it puts tremendous emphasis on fast and accurate jumping, probably more so than any other event. Given that only 3 or 4 line up in a normal year seemingly capable of winning it on known form, it is these horses that are to a large extent forced to attack the course thus, and go for broke. I suspect it might be worth reflecting then just how many leading fancies in recent years have fallen, or made race ending mistakes, as I think it might be more relevant here than any other race, given that there appears to be a reasonable expectation that one will come down. I realise it's normally an 'unknown' element you have to take on trust, but with all the potential winning candidates required to race and jump at speed, there's probably more grounds for factoring it into one's calculations than normal
2007 - Well Chief fell when fav
2006 - Kauto Star fell when fav
2005 - Azertyuiop made race ending mistake when 2nd fav
2004 - Moscow Flyer fell when fav
2003 - Tuitchev fell when 2nd fav
Of those heading affairs as things stand, who do we think are the most and least likely to fall?
Actually thinking about it, that's 5 renewals, and therefore 10 horses in total covering the first two positions in the market. A 50% failure rate amongst the leading contenders is phenomenally high. Admittedly it's only a small, though recent sample, but the chances of all of the front 4 getting round looks odds against on this snapshot