Royal Ascot

[rorydelargy]

I've done some time ratings for each of the days but mine are based on different standards so may not be of any use.

I actually don't mind that DO - it's the comparison of figures within a control group I'm interested in, as such. Put simply, I thought the figures published on the RUK blog were too perfect to have been attained independently; I think they've simply been adjusted by scale (sorry to use that word again) from the figures published by another party. If your figures differ by his by exactly the same amount, then I'll revise that opinion, but I suspect anyone's method for time analysis will produce occasional outliers.

 

[Colin Phillips]

Surely you are not accusing Mr.McNae of plagiarism, Rory?:blink:

 

[Marble]

Thought it was just scoop sixs that he was interested in plagiarising

 

[rorydelargy]

Thought it was just scoop sixs that he was interested in plagiarising

That wasn't Mr McNae, in fairness.

 

[rorydelargy]

Surely you are not accusing Mr.McNae of plagiarism, Rory?:blink:

Not yet Colin!

 

[Colin Phillips]

Why does the name Peter Naughton come to mind?

 

[Marble]

I've made a mix up.

 

[rorydelargy]

Why does the name Peter Naughton come to mind?

The Ethical Tipster? Can't iamgine.

 

[EC1]

these are a weight adjusted figures i do at the big meetings....I tend to do 2 sets ..with and without weight adjustment...but the ones you are looking at will probably be allowing for weight carried so these are what i got for Tuesday

137 FRANKEL
121 LITTLE BRIDGE
108 MOST IMPROVED
108 DAWN APPROACH
82 HOTOTO

going 4 lb per mile fast [GOOD]

no wfa added to ratings

 

[rorydelargy]

Cheers EC1 - that's very helpful.