If I may make so bold, my dear old online friend, you are a mass of paradoxes and contradictions.
You flit from one system or approach to another, are very (and commendably) open about it here, you wear your heart on your sleeve and are very honest when things go wrong and yet....
....Being open about losing invites comment, you're talking openly so the assumption some others make is you are inviting reaction and feedback yet, when other (maybe more successful) punters helpfully try to steer you in another direction I've seen you get defensive, saying "I do things my way! I'm fine, and do very well, thank you very much!" when subsequent posts like this suggest that's not actually the case.
None of it makes sense to me.
It's often said "if you can't be a good judge, then be a good judge of good judges," or "even if you are a good judge, add to your gains by also being a good judge of good judges."
There are some good judges here - I can tell them, not by the winners they put up, but the observations they make inbetween times, things that resonate with me from my years of experience.
Identify them, follow them and, if there is any transparency to their methodology, seek to emulate it - this stuff actually works.
I've been betting for close to 50 years and most of what keeps my head above water is what I've picked up from others along the way and adopted, adapted, and made my own.
Maybe you are now 1.01 to tell me to F off and mind my own business but, if you openly talk about this stuff, you kinda invite others to make it their business too.
Anyway, good luck.
And before all that - where's MY breakfast??!!