:lol:
its really annoying as a speed figure maker..had him as a 130+ horse last year...looks like he is..but i just couldn't see it at a mile
nice joshing about it anyway - hope you won a packet Steve
You da man, Steve
I'm just clearing the car out to go for my winnings... there's only so much you can wedge into a Volvo Estate though.
hey - now don't rub it in - i'm licking the wounds :lol:
I thought you'd had to sell the Volvo after Denman got beat in the Gold Cup?
Shockingly bad 24 hours or me.
Very interesting result. With the second a 25/1 shot on his 10th run and the third a 20/1 shot on his 8th run, you might be hard pressed to justify a bare rating for the winner that involves them suddenly improving their OR by a significant amount.
For example, based on the ORs of the 4th, 5th, 7th and 9th you could justify a bare rating around 126. But that would involve the 2nd and 3rd improving by around 10lbs each.
Through the 6th and 8th, you'd get around 121, which would have the 2nd and 3rd improving by around 5lbs each.
The most conservative view would probably be that CC has simply run to a bare rating of 118 (his current OR), but with plenty in hand.
Not bad for a non-stayer. Fencing Master is a proper lazy so and so.
Vet looking at the horse - did not pull up "right".
Gotcha, green on debut and in the Dewhurst, needed the run at Newmarket and lame here. My apologies to Fencing Master.
visually it looked a bit better than 118..timefigure should help a little in this situation.
would it be hard to imagine the 2nd +3rd improving by 10?