It may have escaped your attention, but Might Bite didn’t see another horse in the King George for the last mile.
I don’t really care whether you or anyone else believe he idled. I’ve been watching racing long enough to know it when I see it, and I don’t need to read what’s in the form book, to have my mind made up for me. It's not as if he doesn't have previous for it either.
As for Sizing John and Native River, the former not only has to recover from a desperately poor performance in the Christmas Chase, but he has to defy the stat about winners going in again. Very, very few have done it, and those that have, have been demonstrably higher-class than Sizing John, and had much, much better preparations. Add in reports that his work has been poor (or was in the weeks after his outing at Xmas), and he surely has it all to do.
As for Native River, I see no reason why he should run any better than he did last year. The ‘lighter campaign will help’ is a phantom as far as I’m concerned, and it’s perhaps noteworthy that Tizzard appeared to question his own approach for the horse, at his open day yesterday. Regardless, for me Native River is a highly admirable chaser (I backed him in last year's Gold Cup), but he is a high-grade handicapper rather than a genuine G1 performer. I’m perfectly satisfied that Might Bite is a better horse.
As for the King George form, go and read the tail-end of the thread. I think I said you could not rate it any higher than 167, and even that might be on the high-side - which would place it very-much at the lower-end of the scale, in terms of a historical rating. I certainly did not crack it up to be a high-class renewal - I just said that MB won with plenty in hand.
If you can find anywhere on this forum a serious attempt to compare what Might Bite has achieved to date, with what Kauto Star and Denman achieved in their careers, I will fly out to Thailand tomorrow, and give you free butler service for a fortnight.
Please stop making sh*it up.