Just by way of observation, (and I'm reluctant to get drawn into this despite someone's best attempts to goad me). There's a subtle distinction that probably needs pointing out? Now I wouldn't wish to try and claim the high moral ground regarding the purity of posts etc as Internet land generates more than its fair share of borderline libelous insinuations. The difference is that a site that has the endorsement of a few up and coming jockeys as their USP, needs to be extremely careful, as I believe they have an obligation to avoid embarrasing their patrons, and associating their names with some of the allegations that were made against Trainers and owners a like. Now it's my best guess they don't read the site themselves, or if they do, not to any great extent? If they did I think they would have been concerned to see what had been written about the probity of what are essentially potential employers, given that their respective careers are far from assured.
As such the advent of a moderator is probably to be welcomed by all. I should also say its not me that has a fascination for the site concerned. Who starts the threads? why? and for what purpose? I've let my opinions on it be known, and that's all (Its principal amusement value for me, lies in the I.Ds of some of the posters, and their dual personalities/ alter egos).
As such the advent of a moderator is probably to be welcomed by all. I should also say its not me that has a fascination for the site concerned. Who starts the threads? why? and for what purpose? I've let my opinions on it be known, and that's all (Its principal amusement value for me, lies in the I.Ds of some of the posters, and their dual personalities/ alter egos).