The issue of how trainers make it pay has been on my mind this week, even before Colm Murphy’s announcement. Most trainers would tell you that there’s no money to be made from training and it’s only through buying and selling (or the occasional gamble) that any money can be made. I felt a little guilty that, after Bay of Freedom won a 14000 Euro race last week, Peter (Fahey) only got 625 Euros. I guess I could always offer to ‘supplement’ this return but the fact is that, even after two wins this year, I am still making a loss. Now, I have no complaints about that but it is a strange business when both owners and trainers are set up to make losses. This got me thinking about how much Willie Mullins must be making and so using a combination of insight, ignorance , guesswork and instinct I came up with the following assessment of the profitability of Mullins and Co. (All figures in Euros – and apologies for having no Euro key)
I am sure there will be many who disagree with some of the assumptions shown. I have, if anything, tried to be conservative and understate some of the costs. However, I do think it is directionally accurate and highlights some issues.
In the 2015/16 Jump Season, Mullins horses accumulated prize money totaling 5.6m across England and Ireland. Add to that another 300 in flat earnings and his total prize money was 5.919m; this would have yielded c414k to the trainer.
(Note – I have ignored any winnings in France or overseas)
Over this period he ran 191 horses; let’s assume daily training fees of 55 euros and ‘at grass’ daily fees of 20 euros. If we assume each horse is in training for 250 days (at grass the other days) then this this works out to around 16k per year for each of these horses. Let’s also assume he has another 50 horses not in training at all and they are just charged out at the ‘at grass’ rate. The training fees generated would be around 3.356m.
The total income would therefore be 3.770m
I am assuming, for the purpose of this exercise, that additional costs (gallop fees, vet fees, travel, medication, shoes etc etc) are charged separately and at no mark-up .
So that’s the income; what about the costs?
Regular feed (hay , nuts, regular supplements etc) are included in the training fee. Let’s say these would be 40 euros per horse per week; this would total 501k per year.
Staff would be the biggest single expense. Let’s assume each lad/lass has four horses then there would be 60 lads. Assuming they are paid 400 per week plus overtime and employer taxes (the minimum is 380 Euros for a 39 hour week) then the annual cost would be 1.807m. (As an aside is 400 Euros per week sustainable?)
In addition, he would need foremen, head lads, pupil assistants, gallops managers, maintenance staff, admin staff. I have assumed 15 Full Time Equivalents and let’s say they cost an average of 50k per FTE per year; this would be another 750k.
Add to all of this the costs of replacing gallops, repairs and general maintenance as well as replacement of machinery and facilities ; this could easily be another 200k.
These costs total 3.258m and when compared to the 3.77m income would deliver a ‘profit’ of just over 511k. Of course, there is big cost missing in this analysis: Willie Mullins needs to be paid!
How much would you pay the best and most successful exponent in one of Ireland’s biggest industries? I don’t think $400k is out of the question. So, once Mullins has taken appropriate draw for his work, if the above numbers are anywhere near close, he would have barely broken even in a year when all prize money and number of winners records were not just broken but destroyed.
You remember that I assumed Mullins charges 60 Euros per day when in training and 20 Euros when ‘at grass’? Well, Peter Fahey charges 35 and 12 Euros respectively. My fear isn’t that Peter increases his rates but that he doesn’t come to the same conclusion as Colm Murphy and leaves the training ranks himself. I should stress that nothing in our conversations would have you believe anything other than he will stay training and that is driven in large part because of his passion. However, I am sure Colm Murphy had passion and the horse racing industry needs to find a solution; it cannot be subsidized by owners and trainers both losing money. That is not a model for a sustainable business