By Racing Post Staff 3:14PM 30 DEC 2009
NICK WILLIAMS on Wednesday described Diamond Harry as a "50-50 chance" to go chasing this season, while also referring to the better opportunities for staying chasers over staying hurdlers.
Diamond Harry had initially been given the Ladbrokes World Hurdle as his aim for this term, but after finishing six lengths behind Big Buck's in Tuesday's Racing UK on Virgin 536 Long Walk Hurdle, Williams is assessing his options.
Speaking on At The Races, he said: "It appears the official handicapper would have us spot-on at 165. I'd have preferred to put it to [Big Buck's] a bit more up the home straight instead of going wide but I dare say the race result would have been the same.
"He's a 50-50 chance [to go chasing]. If he goes to the Cleeve Hurdle, he gets a four pound pull but on yesterday's run that's not enough."
Prizes such as the Hennessy Gold Cup were also put forward by Williams as reasons for potentially switching to fences.
Nick Williams: looking ahead
PICTURE: Edward Whitaker
"He's schooled fine and there are drawbacks to staying over hurdles and it makes a lot of difference next season," he said.
"There's only place for one or two [dominant] horses in staying hurdles and it's not alot of fun coming second, third, second. It's better running in races like the Hennessy and there's better chances for three mile chasers than three mile hurdlers."
Plenty of other pots to be won after Cheltenham. It would be madness to stay hurdling with him. Get a couple of soft novice chases into him before the summer, or they could keep his novice status and still run in the Hennessey like Strong Flow did a few years back.
And various others. Timmy needs to retire asap.I wouldn't be at all interested in Timmy's opinion of where they should go with him (not so sure connections would be either!!) after the crappy rides he's been giving the horse.
He's certainly had his moments but I'm convinced that his nerve has gone. I've already campaigned the Nick Williams camp to jock him off in favour of the much maligned Daryl Jacob, who has improved out of all recognition since this time last year.Some would argue he was never any good.
I wouldn't be at all interested in Timmy's opinion of where they should go with him (not so sure connections would be either!!) after the crappy rides he's been giving the horse.
I haven't seen enough everyday racing to give an opinion on Murphy in general, but there is nothing wrong with the rides he has given Diamond Harry.
The horse is at the level he is, and nothing any jockey would have done would have improved his performance behind Big Bucks.
I agree - he is just not as good as some thought. People said he ran below form at Cheltenham last year but Karabak confirmed himself the better horse again last time out at Newbury.
I love Big Bucks, he is gorgeous looking. Seems to get a little bored in the middle of his races like he wants to nip out and have a fag. Mind you, he could, and still win.
Not contradicting you Rory, but what was shocking about it? I backed him there and had no complaints whatsoever.
Your general point I would much more agree with.
That would be the general reading of it at first glance, but the fact is that Timmy Murphy rides plenty of others in the same unorthodox way, particularly the apparently perfectly straighforward Starluck. I don't deny that Diamond Harry has the ability to hang, but his jockey should be a help, not a hindrance in that regard.He looks an awkward ride to me, and the fact Murphy brought him over to the rail suggested he did not want to have to ask the horse a serious question out in the middle of the track.